Cargando…

A Multivariate Diagnostic Model Based on Urinary EpCAM-CD9-Positive Extracellular Vesicles for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer death in males worldwide. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has considerably improved the detection of PCa, it has also led to a dramatic increase in overdiagnosing in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Yibei, Wang, Yiyun, Cao, Ying, Yu, Pan, Zhang, Lingyu, Liu, Zhenping, Ping, Ying, Wang, Danhua, Zhang, Gong, Sang, Yiwen, Wang, Xuchu, Tao, Zhihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.777684
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer death in males worldwide. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has considerably improved the detection of PCa, it has also led to a dramatic increase in overdiagnosing indolent disease due to its low specificity. This study aimed to develop and validate a multivariate diagnostic model based on the urinary epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-CD9–positive extracellular vesicles (EVs) (uEV(EpCAM-CD9)) to improve the diagnosis of PCa. METHODS: We investigated the performance of uEV(EpCAM-CD9) from urine samples of 193 participants (112 PCa patients, 55 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, and 26 healthy donors) to diagnose PCa using our laboratory-developed chemiluminescent immunoassay. We applied machine learning to training sets and subsequently evaluated the multivariate diagnostic model based on uEV(EpCAM-CD9) in validation sets. RESULTS: Results showed that uEV(EpCAM-CD9) was able to distinguish PCa from controls, and a significant decrease of uEV(EpCAM-CD9) was observed after prostatectomy. We further used a training set (N = 116) and constructed an exclusive multivariate diagnostic model based on uEV(EpCAM-CD9), PSA, and other clinical parameters, which showed an enhanced diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and performed excellently to diagnose PCa [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.952, P < 0.0001]. When applied to a validation test (N = 77), the model achieved an AUC of 0.947 (P < 0.0001). Moreover, this diagnostic model also exhibited a superior diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.917, P < 0.0001) over PSA (AUC = 0.712, P = 0.0018) at the PSA gray zone. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate model based on uEV(EpCAM-CD9) achieved a notable diagnostic performance to diagnose PCa. In the future, this model may potentially be used to better select patients for prostate transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy.