Cargando…
Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277 |
_version_ | 1784611650103410688 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jie D’Souza, Rohan Kharrat, Ashraf Fell, Deshayne B. Snelgrove, John W. Murphy, Kellie E. Shah, Prakesh S. |
author_facet | Yang, Jie D’Souza, Rohan Kharrat, Ashraf Fell, Deshayne B. Snelgrove, John W. Murphy, Kellie E. Shah, Prakesh S. |
author_sort | Yang, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until August 14, 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVID‐19 pandemic time period and the pre‐pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Forty‐five studies with low‐to‐moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1 843 665 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 23 564 552 pregnancies during the pre‐pandemic period, were included. There was significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (35 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98), but not in adjusted estimates (six studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13). This reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (25 studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86–0.96) but not in regional/national studies (10 studies, uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95–1.02). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (six studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.96) and induced PTB (five studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97). There was no difference in the odds of stillbirth between the pandemic and pre‐pandemic time periods (24 studies, uaOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97–1.26 and four studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81–1.38). There was an increase in mean birthweight during the pandemic period compared with the pre‐pandemic period (six studies, mean difference 17 g, 95% CI 7–28 g). The odds of maternal mortality were increased (four studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.26); however, only unadjusted estimates were available and the result was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no statistically significant difference in stillbirth between pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8653307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86533072021-12-08 Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) Yang, Jie D’Souza, Rohan Kharrat, Ashraf Fell, Deshayne B. Snelgrove, John W. Murphy, Kellie E. Shah, Prakesh S. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Living Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until August 14, 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVID‐19 pandemic time period and the pre‐pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Forty‐five studies with low‐to‐moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1 843 665 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 23 564 552 pregnancies during the pre‐pandemic period, were included. There was significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (35 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98), but not in adjusted estimates (six studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13). This reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (25 studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86–0.96) but not in regional/national studies (10 studies, uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95–1.02). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (six studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.96) and induced PTB (five studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97). There was no difference in the odds of stillbirth between the pandemic and pre‐pandemic time periods (24 studies, uaOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97–1.26 and four studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81–1.38). There was an increase in mean birthweight during the pandemic period compared with the pre‐pandemic period (six studies, mean difference 17 g, 95% CI 7–28 g). The odds of maternal mortality were increased (four studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.26); however, only unadjusted estimates were available and the result was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no statistically significant difference in stillbirth between pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8653307/ /pubmed/34730232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Living Systematic Review Yang, Jie D’Souza, Rohan Kharrat, Ashraf Fell, Deshayne B. Snelgrove, John W. Murphy, Kellie E. Shah, Prakesh S. Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title | Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title_full | Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title_fullStr | Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title_short | Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) |
title_sort | coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: a living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated aug 14, 2021) |
topic | Living Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjie coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT dsouzarohan coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT kharratashraf coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT felldeshayneb coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT snelgrovejohnw coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT murphykelliee coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 AT shahprakeshs coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021 |