Cargando…

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)

INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jie, D’Souza, Rohan, Kharrat, Ashraf, Fell, Deshayne B., Snelgrove, John W., Murphy, Kellie E., Shah, Prakesh S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277
_version_ 1784611650103410688
author Yang, Jie
D’Souza, Rohan
Kharrat, Ashraf
Fell, Deshayne B.
Snelgrove, John W.
Murphy, Kellie E.
Shah, Prakesh S.
author_facet Yang, Jie
D’Souza, Rohan
Kharrat, Ashraf
Fell, Deshayne B.
Snelgrove, John W.
Murphy, Kellie E.
Shah, Prakesh S.
author_sort Yang, Jie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until August 14, 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVID‐19 pandemic time period and the pre‐pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Forty‐five studies with low‐to‐moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1 843 665 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 23 564 552 pregnancies during the pre‐pandemic period, were included. There was significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (35 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98), but not in adjusted estimates (six studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13). This reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (25 studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86–0.96) but not in regional/national studies (10 studies, uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95–1.02). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (six studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.96) and induced PTB (five studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97). There was no difference in the odds of stillbirth between the pandemic and pre‐pandemic time periods (24 studies, uaOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97–1.26 and four studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81–1.38). There was an increase in mean birthweight during the pandemic period compared with the pre‐pandemic period (six studies, mean difference 17 g, 95% CI 7–28 g). The odds of maternal mortality were increased (four studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.26); however, only unadjusted estimates were available and the result was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no statistically significant difference in stillbirth between pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8653307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86533072021-12-08 Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021) Yang, Jie D’Souza, Rohan Kharrat, Ashraf Fell, Deshayne B. Snelgrove, John W. Murphy, Kellie E. Shah, Prakesh S. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Living Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta‐analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until August 14, 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVID‐19 pandemic time period and the pre‐pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Forty‐five studies with low‐to‐moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1 843 665 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 23 564 552 pregnancies during the pre‐pandemic period, were included. There was significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (35 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98), but not in adjusted estimates (six studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13). This reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (25 studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86–0.96) but not in regional/national studies (10 studies, uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95–1.02). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (six studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.96) and induced PTB (five studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97). There was no difference in the odds of stillbirth between the pandemic and pre‐pandemic time periods (24 studies, uaOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97–1.26 and four studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81–1.38). There was an increase in mean birthweight during the pandemic period compared with the pre‐pandemic period (six studies, mean difference 17 g, 95% CI 7–28 g). The odds of maternal mortality were increased (four studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.26); however, only unadjusted estimates were available and the result was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no statistically significant difference in stillbirth between pandemic and pre‐pandemic periods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8653307/ /pubmed/34730232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Living Systematic Review
Yang, Jie
D’Souza, Rohan
Kharrat, Ashraf
Fell, Deshayne B.
Snelgrove, John W.
Murphy, Kellie E.
Shah, Prakesh S.
Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title_full Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title_fullStr Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title_full_unstemmed Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title_short Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021)
title_sort coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: a living systematic review and meta‐analysis (updated aug 14, 2021)
topic Living Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14277
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjie coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT dsouzarohan coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT kharratashraf coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT felldeshayneb coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT snelgrovejohnw coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT murphykelliee coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021
AT shahprakeshs coronavirusdisease2019pandemicandpregnancyandneonataloutcomesingeneralpopulationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisupdatedaug142021