Cargando…

Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Tianyang, Lu, Zhao, Wang, Fengzhe, Zhao, Heng, Wang, Jiazheng, Pan, Shinong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573574
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814
_version_ 1784611662321418240
author Gao, Tianyang
Lu, Zhao
Wang, Fengzhe
Zhao, Heng
Wang, Jiazheng
Pan, Shinong
author_facet Gao, Tianyang
Lu, Zhao
Wang, Fengzhe
Zhao, Heng
Wang, Jiazheng
Pan, Shinong
author_sort Gao, Tianyang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received SENSE-TSE and 300 patients received CS-TSE. The SENSE acceleration factor was 1.4 for T1WI, 1.7 for T2WI, and 1.7 for PDWI. The CS total acceleration factor was 2.4, 3.6, 4.0, and 4.0 for T1WI, T2WI, PDWI sagittal, and T2WI transverse, respectively. The image quality of each MRI sequence was evaluated objectively by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjectively on a five-point scale. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MRI sequences of the 300 patients receiving CS-TSE, and their diagnostic consistency was evaluated. The degree of intervertebral foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression was assessed using the T1WI sagittal and T2WI transverse images. RESULTS: The scan time was reduced from 7 min 28 s to 4 min 26 s with CS-TSE. The median score of nerve root image quality was 5 (p > 0.05). The diagnostic consistency using CS-TSE images between the two radiologists was high for diagnosing lumbar diseases (κ > 0.75) and for evaluating the degree of lumbar foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression (κ = 0.882). No differences between SENSE-TSE and CS-TSE were observed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CS-TSE has the potential for diagnosing lumbar vertebrae and disc disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8653421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86534212021-12-30 Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging Gao, Tianyang Lu, Zhao Wang, Fengzhe Zhao, Heng Wang, Jiazheng Pan, Shinong Curr Med Imaging Article OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received SENSE-TSE and 300 patients received CS-TSE. The SENSE acceleration factor was 1.4 for T1WI, 1.7 for T2WI, and 1.7 for PDWI. The CS total acceleration factor was 2.4, 3.6, 4.0, and 4.0 for T1WI, T2WI, PDWI sagittal, and T2WI transverse, respectively. The image quality of each MRI sequence was evaluated objectively by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjectively on a five-point scale. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MRI sequences of the 300 patients receiving CS-TSE, and their diagnostic consistency was evaluated. The degree of intervertebral foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression was assessed using the T1WI sagittal and T2WI transverse images. RESULTS: The scan time was reduced from 7 min 28 s to 4 min 26 s with CS-TSE. The median score of nerve root image quality was 5 (p > 0.05). The diagnostic consistency using CS-TSE images between the two radiologists was high for diagnosing lumbar diseases (κ > 0.75) and for evaluating the degree of lumbar foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression (κ = 0.882). No differences between SENSE-TSE and CS-TSE were observed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CS-TSE has the potential for diagnosing lumbar vertebrae and disc disorders. Bentham Science Publishers 2021-08-24 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8653421/ /pubmed/33573574 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814 Text en © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Gao, Tianyang
Lu, Zhao
Wang, Fengzhe
Zhao, Heng
Wang, Jiazheng
Pan, Shinong
Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title_full Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title_fullStr Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title_short Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
title_sort using the compressed sensing technique for lumbar vertebrae imaging: comparison with conventional parallel imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573574
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814
work_keys_str_mv AT gaotianyang usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging
AT luzhao usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging
AT wangfengzhe usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging
AT zhaoheng usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging
AT wangjiazheng usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging
AT panshinong usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging