Cargando…
Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging
OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573574 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814 |
_version_ | 1784611662321418240 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Tianyang Lu, Zhao Wang, Fengzhe Zhao, Heng Wang, Jiazheng Pan, Shinong |
author_facet | Gao, Tianyang Lu, Zhao Wang, Fengzhe Zhao, Heng Wang, Jiazheng Pan, Shinong |
author_sort | Gao, Tianyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received SENSE-TSE and 300 patients received CS-TSE. The SENSE acceleration factor was 1.4 for T1WI, 1.7 for T2WI, and 1.7 for PDWI. The CS total acceleration factor was 2.4, 3.6, 4.0, and 4.0 for T1WI, T2WI, PDWI sagittal, and T2WI transverse, respectively. The image quality of each MRI sequence was evaluated objectively by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjectively on a five-point scale. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MRI sequences of the 300 patients receiving CS-TSE, and their diagnostic consistency was evaluated. The degree of intervertebral foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression was assessed using the T1WI sagittal and T2WI transverse images. RESULTS: The scan time was reduced from 7 min 28 s to 4 min 26 s with CS-TSE. The median score of nerve root image quality was 5 (p > 0.05). The diagnostic consistency using CS-TSE images between the two radiologists was high for diagnosing lumbar diseases (κ > 0.75) and for evaluating the degree of lumbar foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression (κ = 0.882). No differences between SENSE-TSE and CS-TSE were observed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CS-TSE has the potential for diagnosing lumbar vertebrae and disc disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8653421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86534212021-12-30 Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging Gao, Tianyang Lu, Zhao Wang, Fengzhe Zhao, Heng Wang, Jiazheng Pan, Shinong Curr Med Imaging Article OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional sensitivity encoding turbo spin-echo (SENSE-TSE) with compressed sensing plus SENSE turbo spin-echo (CS-TSE) in lumbar vertebrae magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study of lumbar vertebrae MRI included 600 patients; 300 patients received SENSE-TSE and 300 patients received CS-TSE. The SENSE acceleration factor was 1.4 for T1WI, 1.7 for T2WI, and 1.7 for PDWI. The CS total acceleration factor was 2.4, 3.6, 4.0, and 4.0 for T1WI, T2WI, PDWI sagittal, and T2WI transverse, respectively. The image quality of each MRI sequence was evaluated objectively by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjectively on a five-point scale. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MRI sequences of the 300 patients receiving CS-TSE, and their diagnostic consistency was evaluated. The degree of intervertebral foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression was assessed using the T1WI sagittal and T2WI transverse images. RESULTS: The scan time was reduced from 7 min 28 s to 4 min 26 s with CS-TSE. The median score of nerve root image quality was 5 (p > 0.05). The diagnostic consistency using CS-TSE images between the two radiologists was high for diagnosing lumbar diseases (κ > 0.75) and for evaluating the degree of lumbar foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression (κ = 0.882). No differences between SENSE-TSE and CS-TSE were observed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CS-TSE has the potential for diagnosing lumbar vertebrae and disc disorders. Bentham Science Publishers 2021-08-24 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8653421/ /pubmed/33573574 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814 Text en © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Gao, Tianyang Lu, Zhao Wang, Fengzhe Zhao, Heng Wang, Jiazheng Pan, Shinong Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title | Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title_full | Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title_fullStr | Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title_short | Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging |
title_sort | using the compressed sensing technique for lumbar vertebrae imaging: comparison with conventional parallel imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573574 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210126155814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaotianyang usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging AT luzhao usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging AT wangfengzhe usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging AT zhaoheng usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging AT wangjiazheng usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging AT panshinong usingthecompressedsensingtechniqueforlumbarvertebraeimagingcomparisonwithconventionalparallelimaging |