Cargando…

Suptavumab for the Prevention of Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Preterm Infants

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of childhood medically attended respiratory infection (MARI). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in 1154 preterm infants of 1 or 2 doses of suptavumab, a human monoclonal antibody that can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simões, Eric A F, Forleo-Neto, Eduardo, Geba, Gregory P, Kamal, Mohamed, Yang, Feng, Cicirello, Helen, Houghton, Matthew R, Rideman, Ronald, Zhao, Qiong, Benvin, Sarah L, Hawes, Alicia, Fuller, Erin D, Wloga, Elzbieta, Pizarro, Jose M Novoa, Munoz, Flor M, Rush, Scott A, McLellan, Jason S, Lipsich, Leah, Stahl, Neil, Yancopoulos, George D, Weinreich, David M, Kyratsous, Christos A, Sivapalasingam, Sumathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa951
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of childhood medically attended respiratory infection (MARI). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in 1154 preterm infants of 1 or 2 doses of suptavumab, a human monoclonal antibody that can bind and block a conserved epitope on RSV A and B subtypes, for the prevention of RSV MARI. The primary endpoint was proportion of subjects with RSV-confirmed hospitalizations or outpatient lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between primary endpoint rates (8.1%, placebo; 7.7%, 1-dose; 9.3%, 2-dose). Suptavumab prevented RSV A infections (relative risks, .38; 95% confidence interval [CI], .14–1.05 in the 1-dose group and .39 [95% CI, .14–1.07] in the 2-dose group; nominal significance of combined suptavumab group vs placebo; P = .0499), while increasing the rate of RSV B infections (relative risk 1.36 [95% CI, .73–2.56] in the 1-dose group and 1.69 [95% CI, .92–3.08] in the 2-dose group; nominal significance of combined suptavumab group vs placebo; P = .12). Sequenced RSV isolates demonstrated no suptavumab epitope changes in RSV A isolates, while all RSV B isolates had 2–amino acid substitution in the suptavumab epitope that led to loss of neutralization activity. Treatment emergent adverse events were balanced across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Suptavumab did not reduce overall RSV hospitalizations or outpatient LRTI because of a newly circulating mutant strain of RSV B. Genetic variation in circulating RSV strains will continue to challenge prevention efforts. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02325791.