Cargando…

Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Background Data suggests there are demographic and biological differences in colon cancer between young and typical-onset patients. However, it is unclear if these differences persist in rectal cancer patients, exclusive of colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of a large national database to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan, Bingmer, Katherine, Ofshteyn, Asya, Sarode, Anuja L, Ginesi, Meridith, Stein, Sharon L, Steinhagen, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926010
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19412
_version_ 1784611791984132096
author Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan
Bingmer, Katherine
Ofshteyn, Asya
Sarode, Anuja L
Ginesi, Meridith
Stein, Sharon L
Steinhagen, Emily
author_facet Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan
Bingmer, Katherine
Ofshteyn, Asya
Sarode, Anuja L
Ginesi, Meridith
Stein, Sharon L
Steinhagen, Emily
author_sort Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Background Data suggests there are demographic and biological differences in colon cancer between young and typical-onset patients. However, it is unclear if these differences persist in rectal cancer patients, exclusive of colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of a large national database to evaluate age-based differences in demographics, tumor features, and treatment among patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database from 2004-2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped by age at diagnosis: early-onset, defined as <40 years, mid-onset 40-49, and late-onset ≥50. Propensity matching controlled for demographic variation among cohorts. Pairwise Chi-square with Bonferroni correction was used for analysis. Results Thirty thousand nine hundred seventy-eight patients were included: 1,249 (4%) early-onset, 4,156 (13%) middle-onset, and 25,573 (83%) late-onset. Significant differences existed between all three cohorts in nearly all demographic and pathologic metrics. Control for demographic variation revealed early-onset and middle-onset cohorts differed only with respect to the stage at presentation, while early-onset and late-onset cohorts differed more significantly on the basis of stage, histology, and oncologic management. Conclusion The demographic differences observed demonstrate that patients under 50 should not be considered one cohort. Propensity matching led to a decrease in tumor trait differences among cohorts, suggesting that demographics other than age drive variation in tumor biology. Young patients received more aggressive management, implying the presence of an age bias. Age-based screening is likely insufficient and may exclude the rising proportion of young patients at risk for disease, while age-based management may lead to under- or overtreatment of patients at either end of the age spectrum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8654076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86540762021-12-17 Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan Bingmer, Katherine Ofshteyn, Asya Sarode, Anuja L Ginesi, Meridith Stein, Sharon L Steinhagen, Emily Cureus General Surgery Background Data suggests there are demographic and biological differences in colon cancer between young and typical-onset patients. However, it is unclear if these differences persist in rectal cancer patients, exclusive of colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of a large national database to evaluate age-based differences in demographics, tumor features, and treatment among patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database from 2004-2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped by age at diagnosis: early-onset, defined as <40 years, mid-onset 40-49, and late-onset ≥50. Propensity matching controlled for demographic variation among cohorts. Pairwise Chi-square with Bonferroni correction was used for analysis. Results Thirty thousand nine hundred seventy-eight patients were included: 1,249 (4%) early-onset, 4,156 (13%) middle-onset, and 25,573 (83%) late-onset. Significant differences existed between all three cohorts in nearly all demographic and pathologic metrics. Control for demographic variation revealed early-onset and middle-onset cohorts differed only with respect to the stage at presentation, while early-onset and late-onset cohorts differed more significantly on the basis of stage, histology, and oncologic management. Conclusion The demographic differences observed demonstrate that patients under 50 should not be considered one cohort. Propensity matching led to a decrease in tumor trait differences among cohorts, suggesting that demographics other than age drive variation in tumor biology. Young patients received more aggressive management, implying the presence of an age bias. Age-based screening is likely insufficient and may exclude the rising proportion of young patients at risk for disease, while age-based management may lead to under- or overtreatment of patients at either end of the age spectrum. Cureus 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8654076/ /pubmed/34926010 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19412 Text en Copyright © 2021, Bliggenstorfer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Bliggenstorfer, Jonathan
Bingmer, Katherine
Ofshteyn, Asya
Sarode, Anuja L
Ginesi, Meridith
Stein, Sharon L
Steinhagen, Emily
Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title_full Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title_fullStr Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title_short Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database
title_sort evaluation of demographics and management of rectal cancer by age group: a retrospective propensity matched cohort analysis of the national cancer database
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926010
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19412
work_keys_str_mv AT bliggenstorferjonathan evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT bingmerkatherine evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT ofshteynasya evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT sarodeanujal evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT ginesimeridith evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT steinsharonl evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase
AT steinhagenemily evaluationofdemographicsandmanagementofrectalcancerbyagegrouparetrospectivepropensitymatchedcohortanalysisofthenationalcancerdatabase