Cargando…

Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc

BACKGROUND: Temsavir (TMR), the active agent of the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor fostemsavir (FTR), the CD4-directed attachment inhibitor ibalizumab (IBA), and the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (MVC) are antiretroviral agents that target steps in HIV-1 viral entry. Although mechanisms of inhibiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Ronald, Gartland, Margaret, Li, Zhufang, Zhou, Nannan, Cockett, Mark, Beloor, Jagadish, Lataillade, Max, Ackerman, Peter, Krystal, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003097
_version_ 1784611832499011584
author Rose, Ronald
Gartland, Margaret
Li, Zhufang
Zhou, Nannan
Cockett, Mark
Beloor, Jagadish
Lataillade, Max
Ackerman, Peter
Krystal, Mark
author_facet Rose, Ronald
Gartland, Margaret
Li, Zhufang
Zhou, Nannan
Cockett, Mark
Beloor, Jagadish
Lataillade, Max
Ackerman, Peter
Krystal, Mark
author_sort Rose, Ronald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temsavir (TMR), the active agent of the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor fostemsavir (FTR), the CD4-directed attachment inhibitor ibalizumab (IBA), and the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (MVC) are antiretroviral agents that target steps in HIV-1 viral entry. Although mechanisms of inhibition of the three agents are different, it is important to understand whether there is potential for cross-resistance between these agents, as all involve interactions with gp120. METHODS: Envelopes derived from plasma samples from participants in the BRIGHTE study who experienced protocol-derived virologic failure (PDVF) and were co-dosed with FTR and either IBA or MVC were analyzed for susceptibility to the agents. Also, CCR5-tropic MVC-resistant envelopes from the MOTIVATE trials were regenerated and studies were performed to understand whether susceptibility to multiple agents were linked. RESULTS: The cloned envelopes exhibited reduced susceptibility to TMR and resistance to the co-dosed agent. At PDVF, emergent or preexisting amino acid substitutions were present at TMR positions of interest. When amino acid substitutions at these positions were reverted to the consensus sequence, full susceptibility to TMR was restored without effecting resistance to the co-dosed agent. In addition, five envelopes from MOTIVATE were regenerated and exhibited R5-tropic-MVC-resistance. Only one exhibited reduced susceptibility to TMR and it contained an M426L polymorphism. When reverted to 426M, full sensitivity for TMR was restored, but it remained MVC resistant. CONCLUSION: The data confirm that decreased susceptibility to TMR and resistance to IBA or MVC are not linked and that there is no cross-resistance between either of these two agents and FTR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8654283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86542832021-12-15 Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc Rose, Ronald Gartland, Margaret Li, Zhufang Zhou, Nannan Cockett, Mark Beloor, Jagadish Lataillade, Max Ackerman, Peter Krystal, Mark AIDS Basic Science BACKGROUND: Temsavir (TMR), the active agent of the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor fostemsavir (FTR), the CD4-directed attachment inhibitor ibalizumab (IBA), and the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (MVC) are antiretroviral agents that target steps in HIV-1 viral entry. Although mechanisms of inhibition of the three agents are different, it is important to understand whether there is potential for cross-resistance between these agents, as all involve interactions with gp120. METHODS: Envelopes derived from plasma samples from participants in the BRIGHTE study who experienced protocol-derived virologic failure (PDVF) and were co-dosed with FTR and either IBA or MVC were analyzed for susceptibility to the agents. Also, CCR5-tropic MVC-resistant envelopes from the MOTIVATE trials were regenerated and studies were performed to understand whether susceptibility to multiple agents were linked. RESULTS: The cloned envelopes exhibited reduced susceptibility to TMR and resistance to the co-dosed agent. At PDVF, emergent or preexisting amino acid substitutions were present at TMR positions of interest. When amino acid substitutions at these positions were reverted to the consensus sequence, full susceptibility to TMR was restored without effecting resistance to the co-dosed agent. In addition, five envelopes from MOTIVATE were regenerated and exhibited R5-tropic-MVC-resistance. Only one exhibited reduced susceptibility to TMR and it contained an M426L polymorphism. When reverted to 426M, full sensitivity for TMR was restored, but it remained MVC resistant. CONCLUSION: The data confirm that decreased susceptibility to TMR and resistance to IBA or MVC are not linked and that there is no cross-resistance between either of these two agents and FTR. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-01 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8654283/ /pubmed/34628442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003097 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Basic Science
Rose, Ronald
Gartland, Margaret
Li, Zhufang
Zhou, Nannan
Cockett, Mark
Beloor, Jagadish
Lataillade, Max
Ackerman, Peter
Krystal, Mark
Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title_full Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title_fullStr Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title_short Clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
title_sort clinical evidence for a lack of cross-resistance between temsavir and ibalizumab or maraviroc
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003097
work_keys_str_mv AT roseronald clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT gartlandmargaret clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT lizhufang clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT zhounannan clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT cockettmark clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT beloorjagadish clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT lataillademax clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT ackermanpeter clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc
AT krystalmark clinicalevidenceforalackofcrossresistancebetweentemsavirandibalizumabormaraviroc