Cargando…
Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production
In nature, species interacts/competes with one other within their surrounding for food and space and the type of interactions are unique to each species. The interacting partners secrete different metabolites, which may have high importance in human welfare. Fungal–fungal interactions are complex me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2021.1932627 |
_version_ | 1784611856962289664 |
---|---|
author | Dullah, Samim Hazarika, Dibya Jyoti Parveen, Assma Kakoti, Merilin Borgohain, Tanushree Gautom, Trishnamoni Bhattacharyya, Ashok Barooah, Madhumita Boro, Robin Chandra |
author_facet | Dullah, Samim Hazarika, Dibya Jyoti Parveen, Assma Kakoti, Merilin Borgohain, Tanushree Gautom, Trishnamoni Bhattacharyya, Ashok Barooah, Madhumita Boro, Robin Chandra |
author_sort | Dullah, Samim |
collection | PubMed |
description | In nature, species interacts/competes with one other within their surrounding for food and space and the type of interactions are unique to each species. The interacting partners secrete different metabolites, which may have high importance in human welfare. Fungal–fungal interactions are complex mechanisms that need better understanding. Here, 14 fungal isolates were facilitated in 105 possible combinations to interact on potato dextrose agar. Morphologically, no changes were observed when the same fungal isolates were allowed to interact within them. However, 10 interactions between different fungal isolates showed mutual replacement with each fungus; capturing territory from the other. Contrastingly, 35 interactions resulted into complete replacement as one of the fungi was inhibited by rapid growth of the other fungus. In 46 interactions, formation of barrage was observed leading to deadlock type of interaction wherein both fungi have restricted growth. To study in details about the barrage formation, two fungal interactions were taken (i) T. coccinea vs. L. lactinea and (ii) T. coccinea vs. T. versicolor. Microscopic changes in the hyphal growth during interaction were observed. There was significant increase in the enzymatic activities including cellulase, xylanase and chitinase during in-vitro fungal–fungal interaction, suggesting the importance of such interactions for commercial enzyme production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8654418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86544182021-12-09 Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production Dullah, Samim Hazarika, Dibya Jyoti Parveen, Assma Kakoti, Merilin Borgohain, Tanushree Gautom, Trishnamoni Bhattacharyya, Ashok Barooah, Madhumita Boro, Robin Chandra Mycology Research Article In nature, species interacts/competes with one other within their surrounding for food and space and the type of interactions are unique to each species. The interacting partners secrete different metabolites, which may have high importance in human welfare. Fungal–fungal interactions are complex mechanisms that need better understanding. Here, 14 fungal isolates were facilitated in 105 possible combinations to interact on potato dextrose agar. Morphologically, no changes were observed when the same fungal isolates were allowed to interact within them. However, 10 interactions between different fungal isolates showed mutual replacement with each fungus; capturing territory from the other. Contrastingly, 35 interactions resulted into complete replacement as one of the fungi was inhibited by rapid growth of the other fungus. In 46 interactions, formation of barrage was observed leading to deadlock type of interaction wherein both fungi have restricted growth. To study in details about the barrage formation, two fungal interactions were taken (i) T. coccinea vs. L. lactinea and (ii) T. coccinea vs. T. versicolor. Microscopic changes in the hyphal growth during interaction were observed. There was significant increase in the enzymatic activities including cellulase, xylanase and chitinase during in-vitro fungal–fungal interaction, suggesting the importance of such interactions for commercial enzyme production. Taylor & Francis 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8654418/ /pubmed/34900382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2021.1932627 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dullah, Samim Hazarika, Dibya Jyoti Parveen, Assma Kakoti, Merilin Borgohain, Tanushree Gautom, Trishnamoni Bhattacharyya, Ashok Barooah, Madhumita Boro, Robin Chandra Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title | Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title_full | Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title_fullStr | Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title_full_unstemmed | Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title_short | Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
title_sort | fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2021.1932627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dullahsamim fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT hazarikadibyajyoti fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT parveenassma fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT kakotimerilin fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT borgohaintanushree fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT gautomtrishnamoni fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT bhattacharyyaashok fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT barooahmadhumita fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction AT bororobinchandra fungalinteractionsinducechangesinhyphalmorphologyandenzymeproduction |