Role of the Lumbosacral Transition Vertebra and Vertebral Lamina in the Pathogenesis of Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of lumbosacral transition vertebrae (LSTVs) in both the normal population and the lumbar disc herniation (LDH) population and to determine the risk factors for LDH. METHODS: Between January 2019 and September 2020, all patients aged 18–39 years and underwent an anteroposterior (AP) X‐ray of the lumbar vertebrae were retrospective reviewed in our institution. Those patients who were diagnosed with LDH were eligible for inclusion in the LDH group. During the same period, those patients admitted to our hospital who underwent an anteroposterior X‐ray of the lumbar spine and had not been diagnosed with LDH were included in the control group. Those patients with disease that might affect the lumbar anatomy were excluded from both groups. The type of LSTV was classified according to the Castellvi classification. The height of the lumbar vertebral lamina was evaluated through the h/H index. The inter‐ and intra‐observer reliability was evaluated by one senior radiologist and one senior orthopedist using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between the LSTV and the herniation level was also investigated. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the association of different factors between the LDH group and the control group. RESULTS: Two hundred LDH patients (115 male and 85 female) and 200 individuals (108 male and 92 female) were investigated retrospectively. The prevalence of LSTVs was 71.5% (n = 143) in the LDH group and 34.0% (n = 68) in the control group. The most frequent LSTV types were type Ib and type IIa. The inter‐ and intra‐observer ICCs of the measurement of “h/H” index and the classification of LSTV were all “excellent” (ICC > 0.90). The median h/H index in the control group was significantly higher than that in the LDH group (0.28 (0.26, 0.31) vs 0.34 (0.31, 0.37), P = 0.000). The distribution of the Castellvi classification in the L4/5 and L5/S1 herniation patients was significantly different (P = 0.048). LSTVs, BMI and the h/H index were closely associated with LDH, with odds ratios of 3.06 (95% CI: 2.12–4.43), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13–1.33) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.15), respectively. The incidence of L4/5 disc herniation in patients with an LSTV was significantly more common than that in patients with L5/S1 disc herniation (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LSTVs was 34.0% in the control group and 71.5% in the LDH group; LSTVs and BMI were positively correlated with LDH, and h/H was negatively correlated with LDH.