Cargando…

Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?

PURPOSE: A subset of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) presents with either insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Data on the revisional restrictive options including laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is scarce. This study analyzes the mid-term efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazaridis, Ioannis I., Kraljević, Marko, Süsstrunk, Julian, Köstler, Thomas, Zingg, Urs, Delko, Tarik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34100249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05045-7
_version_ 1784611919946055680
author Lazaridis, Ioannis I.
Kraljević, Marko
Süsstrunk, Julian
Köstler, Thomas
Zingg, Urs
Delko, Tarik
author_facet Lazaridis, Ioannis I.
Kraljević, Marko
Süsstrunk, Julian
Köstler, Thomas
Zingg, Urs
Delko, Tarik
author_sort Lazaridis, Ioannis I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A subset of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) presents with either insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Data on the revisional restrictive options including laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is scarce. This study analyzes the mid-term efficacy and safety of LAGB as a revisional procedure after RYGB. METHODS: Data of all patients with revisional LAGB after primary RYGB between January 2011 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included assessment of weight changes, resolution of comorbidities, and early and late complications during the study period. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The median Body Mass Index (BMI) before revisional LAGB was 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.9–38.1) kg/m(2). After a median follow-up of 33.5 (IQR 19.5–76.5) months, the median BMI was 28.7 (IQR 26.1–32.2) kg/m(2). The median additional Excess Weight Loss (EWL) was 37.6% (IQR 23–44.4), leading to a median total EWL of 79.5% (IQR 54.4–94.6). BMI and EWL post-LAGB improved significantly compared to BMI and EWL pre-LAGB (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome resolved 6 months after LAGB in one patient. Three band deflations occurred during the follow-up. Six patients underwent band removal after a median time of 19 (IQR 15.8–26) months. Overall, thirteen patients underwent a reoperation. There was no loss of follow-up until 5 years. After that, two patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: LAGB may be a salvage option after failed RYGB. However, the high rate of revisions after secondary LAGB needs to be taken into consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8654708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86547082021-12-27 Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It? Lazaridis, Ioannis I. Kraljević, Marko Süsstrunk, Julian Köstler, Thomas Zingg, Urs Delko, Tarik J Gastrointest Surg Original Article PURPOSE: A subset of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) presents with either insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Data on the revisional restrictive options including laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is scarce. This study analyzes the mid-term efficacy and safety of LAGB as a revisional procedure after RYGB. METHODS: Data of all patients with revisional LAGB after primary RYGB between January 2011 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included assessment of weight changes, resolution of comorbidities, and early and late complications during the study period. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The median Body Mass Index (BMI) before revisional LAGB was 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.9–38.1) kg/m(2). After a median follow-up of 33.5 (IQR 19.5–76.5) months, the median BMI was 28.7 (IQR 26.1–32.2) kg/m(2). The median additional Excess Weight Loss (EWL) was 37.6% (IQR 23–44.4), leading to a median total EWL of 79.5% (IQR 54.4–94.6). BMI and EWL post-LAGB improved significantly compared to BMI and EWL pre-LAGB (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome resolved 6 months after LAGB in one patient. Three band deflations occurred during the follow-up. Six patients underwent band removal after a median time of 19 (IQR 15.8–26) months. Overall, thirteen patients underwent a reoperation. There was no loss of follow-up until 5 years. After that, two patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: LAGB may be a salvage option after failed RYGB. However, the high rate of revisions after secondary LAGB needs to be taken into consideration. Springer US 2021-06-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8654708/ /pubmed/34100249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05045-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lazaridis, Ioannis I.
Kraljević, Marko
Süsstrunk, Julian
Köstler, Thomas
Zingg, Urs
Delko, Tarik
Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title_full Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title_fullStr Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title_full_unstemmed Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title_short Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Is It Worth It?
title_sort revisional adjustable gastric band in roux-en-y gastric bypass—is it worth it?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34100249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05045-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lazaridisioannisi revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit
AT kraljevicmarko revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit
AT susstrunkjulian revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit
AT kostlerthomas revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit
AT zinggurs revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit
AT delkotarik revisionaladjustablegastricbandinrouxenygastricbypassisitworthit