Cargando…

Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND: Radioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cockburn, Katrina Clair, Toumi, Zaher, Mackie, Alison, Julyan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05115-w
_version_ 1784611920914939904
author Cockburn, Katrina Clair
Toumi, Zaher
Mackie, Alison
Julyan, Peter
author_facet Cockburn, Katrina Clair
Toumi, Zaher
Mackie, Alison
Julyan, Peter
author_sort Cockburn, Katrina Clair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed, and snowballing from any relevant literature. Full-text studies were included if they were published in the English language and reported outcomes of RGS on human subjects with GEP-NETs. Qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers including a total of 209 patients were included. The tracers used were predominantly indium-111 pentetreotide, gallium-68 DOTA-peptides, and technetium-99m EDDA/HYNIC-peptides. Heterogeneous protocols make comparisons difficult, but most papers reported a benefit from the use of RGS in tumours in the gastrointestinal tract; utility in localisation of pancreatic tumours was less clear. Time between tracer administration and operation varied: from 16 h to 8 days with indium-111, 0–24 h with technetium-99m, and 19–193 min with gallium-68. Eight teams reported the thresholding technique used for discrimination—four used a ratio, four statistical methods, and one looked at the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-offs. Six teams performed follow-up of 24 patients (three pancreas, eight gastrinoma, 13 gastrointestinal tract) for between 3 months and 3 years. Two patients relapsed (one pancreas, one gastrinoma) between 6 and 12 months post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: RGS appears to aid in localisation of gastrointestinal NETs, but the benefit is more equivocal in pancreatic NETs. Further work into outcomes is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8654712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86547122021-12-27 Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review Cockburn, Katrina Clair Toumi, Zaher Mackie, Alison Julyan, Peter J Gastrointest Surg Review Article BACKGROUND: Radioguided surgery (RGS) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) has been suggested as a way to improve intraoperative lesion detection. This systematic literature review of reports of the use of RGS for GEP-NETs was performed to determine if there is a benefit. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed, and snowballing from any relevant literature. Full-text studies were included if they were published in the English language and reported outcomes of RGS on human subjects with GEP-NETs. Qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six papers including a total of 209 patients were included. The tracers used were predominantly indium-111 pentetreotide, gallium-68 DOTA-peptides, and technetium-99m EDDA/HYNIC-peptides. Heterogeneous protocols make comparisons difficult, but most papers reported a benefit from the use of RGS in tumours in the gastrointestinal tract; utility in localisation of pancreatic tumours was less clear. Time between tracer administration and operation varied: from 16 h to 8 days with indium-111, 0–24 h with technetium-99m, and 19–193 min with gallium-68. Eight teams reported the thresholding technique used for discrimination—four used a ratio, four statistical methods, and one looked at the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-offs. Six teams performed follow-up of 24 patients (three pancreas, eight gastrinoma, 13 gastrointestinal tract) for between 3 months and 3 years. Two patients relapsed (one pancreas, one gastrinoma) between 6 and 12 months post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: RGS appears to aid in localisation of gastrointestinal NETs, but the benefit is more equivocal in pancreatic NETs. Further work into outcomes is warranted. Springer US 2021-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8654712/ /pubmed/34506015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05115-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Cockburn, Katrina Clair
Toumi, Zaher
Mackie, Alison
Julyan, Peter
Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title_full Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title_short Radioguided Surgery for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: a Systematic Literature Review
title_sort radioguided surgery for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05115-w
work_keys_str_mv AT cockburnkatrinaclair radioguidedsurgeryforgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursasystematicliteraturereview
AT toumizaher radioguidedsurgeryforgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursasystematicliteraturereview
AT mackiealison radioguidedsurgeryforgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursasystematicliteraturereview
AT julyanpeter radioguidedsurgeryforgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursasystematicliteraturereview