Cargando…

Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors

Cell-based therapy for articular hyaline cartilage regeneration predominantly involves the use of mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. However, the regenerated repair tissue is suboptimal due to the formation of mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage, resulting in inferior long-term functional outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinod, Elizabeth, Johnson, Noel Naveen, Kumar, Sanjay, Amirtham, Soosai Manickam, James, Jithu Varghese, Livingston, Abel, Rebekah, Grace, Daniel, Alfred Job, Ramasamy, Boopalan, Sathishkumar, Solomon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03082-5
_version_ 1784611974563233792
author Vinod, Elizabeth
Johnson, Noel Naveen
Kumar, Sanjay
Amirtham, Soosai Manickam
James, Jithu Varghese
Livingston, Abel
Rebekah, Grace
Daniel, Alfred Job
Ramasamy, Boopalan
Sathishkumar, Solomon
author_facet Vinod, Elizabeth
Johnson, Noel Naveen
Kumar, Sanjay
Amirtham, Soosai Manickam
James, Jithu Varghese
Livingston, Abel
Rebekah, Grace
Daniel, Alfred Job
Ramasamy, Boopalan
Sathishkumar, Solomon
author_sort Vinod, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Cell-based therapy for articular hyaline cartilage regeneration predominantly involves the use of mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. However, the regenerated repair tissue is suboptimal due to the formation of mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage, resulting in inferior long-term functional outcomes. Current preclinical research points towards the potential use of cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors as a viable option for cartilage healing. Fibronectin adhesion assay-derived chondroprogenitors (FAA-CP) and migratory chondroprogenitors (MCP) exhibit features suitable for neocartilage formation but are isolated using distinct protocols. In order to assess superiority between the two cell groups, this study was the first attempt to compare human FAA-CPs with MCPs in normoxic and hypoxic culture conditions, investigating their growth characteristics, surface marker profile and trilineage potency. Their chondrogenic potential was assessed using mRNA expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, glycosaminoglycan content (GAG), and histological staining. MCPs displayed lower levels of hypertrophy markers (RUNX2 and COL1A1), with normoxia-MCP exhibiting significantly higher levels of chondrogenic markers (Aggrecan and COL2A1/COL1A1 ratio), thus showing superior potential towards cartilage repair. Upon chondrogenic induction, normoxia-MCPs also showed significantly higher levels of GAG/DNA with stronger staining. Focused research using MCPs is required as they can be suitable contenders for the generation of hyaline-like repair tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8654938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86549382021-12-09 Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors Vinod, Elizabeth Johnson, Noel Naveen Kumar, Sanjay Amirtham, Soosai Manickam James, Jithu Varghese Livingston, Abel Rebekah, Grace Daniel, Alfred Job Ramasamy, Boopalan Sathishkumar, Solomon Sci Rep Article Cell-based therapy for articular hyaline cartilage regeneration predominantly involves the use of mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. However, the regenerated repair tissue is suboptimal due to the formation of mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage, resulting in inferior long-term functional outcomes. Current preclinical research points towards the potential use of cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors as a viable option for cartilage healing. Fibronectin adhesion assay-derived chondroprogenitors (FAA-CP) and migratory chondroprogenitors (MCP) exhibit features suitable for neocartilage formation but are isolated using distinct protocols. In order to assess superiority between the two cell groups, this study was the first attempt to compare human FAA-CPs with MCPs in normoxic and hypoxic culture conditions, investigating their growth characteristics, surface marker profile and trilineage potency. Their chondrogenic potential was assessed using mRNA expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, glycosaminoglycan content (GAG), and histological staining. MCPs displayed lower levels of hypertrophy markers (RUNX2 and COL1A1), with normoxia-MCP exhibiting significantly higher levels of chondrogenic markers (Aggrecan and COL2A1/COL1A1 ratio), thus showing superior potential towards cartilage repair. Upon chondrogenic induction, normoxia-MCPs also showed significantly higher levels of GAG/DNA with stronger staining. Focused research using MCPs is required as they can be suitable contenders for the generation of hyaline-like repair tissue. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8654938/ /pubmed/34880351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03082-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vinod, Elizabeth
Johnson, Noel Naveen
Kumar, Sanjay
Amirtham, Soosai Manickam
James, Jithu Varghese
Livingston, Abel
Rebekah, Grace
Daniel, Alfred Job
Ramasamy, Boopalan
Sathishkumar, Solomon
Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title_full Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title_fullStr Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title_full_unstemmed Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title_short Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
title_sort migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03082-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vinodelizabeth migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT johnsonnoelnaveen migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT kumarsanjay migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT amirthamsoosaimanickam migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT jamesjithuvarghese migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT livingstonabel migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT rebekahgrace migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT danielalfredjob migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT ramasamyboopalan migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors
AT sathishkumarsolomon migratorychondroprogenitorsretainsuperiorintrinsicchondrogenicpotentialforregenerativecartilagerepairascomparedtohumanfibronectinderivedchondroprogenitors