Cargando…

The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography

Bone surface modifications are crucial for understanding human subsistence and dietary behaviour, and can inform about the techniques employed in the production and use of bone tools. Permission to destructively sample such unique artefacts is not always granted. The recent development of non-destru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie, Martisius, Naomi L., Schulz-Kornas, Ellen, van Casteren, Adam, Tsanova, Tsenka R., Sirakov, Nikolay, Spasov, Rosen, Welker, Frido, Smith, Geoff M., Hublin, Jean-Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w
_version_ 1784611998198136832
author Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie
Martisius, Naomi L.
Schulz-Kornas, Ellen
van Casteren, Adam
Tsanova, Tsenka R.
Sirakov, Nikolay
Spasov, Rosen
Welker, Frido
Smith, Geoff M.
Hublin, Jean-Jacques
author_facet Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie
Martisius, Naomi L.
Schulz-Kornas, Ellen
van Casteren, Adam
Tsanova, Tsenka R.
Sirakov, Nikolay
Spasov, Rosen
Welker, Frido
Smith, Geoff M.
Hublin, Jean-Jacques
author_sort Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie
collection PubMed
description Bone surface modifications are crucial for understanding human subsistence and dietary behaviour, and can inform about the techniques employed in the production and use of bone tools. Permission to destructively sample such unique artefacts is not always granted. The recent development of non-destructive proteomic extraction techniques has provided some alternatives for the analysis of rare and culturally significant artefacts, including bone tools and personal ornaments. The Eraser Extraction Method (EEM), first developed for ZooMS analysis of parchment, has recently been applied to bone and ivory specimens. To test the potential impact of the EEM on ancient bone surfaces, we analyse six anthropogenically modified Palaeolithic bone specimens from Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) through a controlled sampling experiment using qualitative and 3D quantitative microscopy. Although the overall bone topography is generally preserved, our findings demonstrate a slight flattening of the microtopography alongside the formation of micro-striations associated with the use of the eraser for all bone specimens. Such modifications are similar to ancient use-wear traces. We therefore consider the EEM a destructive sampling approach for Palaeolithic bone surfaces. Together with low ZooMS success rates in some of the reported studies, the EEM might not be a suitable approach to taxonomically identify Pleistocene bone specimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86550452021-12-09 The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie Martisius, Naomi L. Schulz-Kornas, Ellen van Casteren, Adam Tsanova, Tsenka R. Sirakov, Nikolay Spasov, Rosen Welker, Frido Smith, Geoff M. Hublin, Jean-Jacques Sci Rep Article Bone surface modifications are crucial for understanding human subsistence and dietary behaviour, and can inform about the techniques employed in the production and use of bone tools. Permission to destructively sample such unique artefacts is not always granted. The recent development of non-destructive proteomic extraction techniques has provided some alternatives for the analysis of rare and culturally significant artefacts, including bone tools and personal ornaments. The Eraser Extraction Method (EEM), first developed for ZooMS analysis of parchment, has recently been applied to bone and ivory specimens. To test the potential impact of the EEM on ancient bone surfaces, we analyse six anthropogenically modified Palaeolithic bone specimens from Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) through a controlled sampling experiment using qualitative and 3D quantitative microscopy. Although the overall bone topography is generally preserved, our findings demonstrate a slight flattening of the microtopography alongside the formation of micro-striations associated with the use of the eraser for all bone specimens. Such modifications are similar to ancient use-wear traces. We therefore consider the EEM a destructive sampling approach for Palaeolithic bone surfaces. Together with low ZooMS success rates in some of the reported studies, the EEM might not be a suitable approach to taxonomically identify Pleistocene bone specimens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8655045/ /pubmed/34880290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie
Martisius, Naomi L.
Schulz-Kornas, Ellen
van Casteren, Adam
Tsanova, Tsenka R.
Sirakov, Nikolay
Spasov, Rosen
Welker, Frido
Smith, Geoff M.
Hublin, Jean-Jacques
The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title_full The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title_fullStr The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title_full_unstemmed The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title_short The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
title_sort effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on palaeolithic bone surface microtopography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w
work_keys_str_mv AT sinetmathiotvirginie theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT martisiusnaomil theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT schulzkornasellen theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT vancasterenadam theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT tsanovatsenkar theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT sirakovnikolay theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT spasovrosen theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT welkerfrido theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT smithgeoffm theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT hublinjeanjacques theeffectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT sinetmathiotvirginie effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT martisiusnaomil effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT schulzkornasellen effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT vancasterenadam effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT tsanovatsenkar effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT sirakovnikolay effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT spasovrosen effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT welkerfrido effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT smithgeoffm effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography
AT hublinjeanjacques effectoferasersamplingforproteomicanalysisonpalaeolithicbonesurfacemicrotopography