Cargando…

Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids

Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashique, Amir M., Atake, Oghenevwogaga J., Ovens, Katie, Guo, Ruiyi, Pratt, Isaac V., Detrich, H. William, Cooper, David M. L., Desvignes, Thomas, Postlethwait, John H., Eames, B. Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537
_version_ 1784612023548510208
author Ashique, Amir M.
Atake, Oghenevwogaga J.
Ovens, Katie
Guo, Ruiyi
Pratt, Isaac V.
Detrich, H. William
Cooper, David M. L.
Desvignes, Thomas
Postlethwait, John H.
Eames, B. Frank
author_facet Ashique, Amir M.
Atake, Oghenevwogaga J.
Ovens, Katie
Guo, Ruiyi
Pratt, Isaac V.
Detrich, H. William
Cooper, David M. L.
Desvignes, Thomas
Postlethwait, John H.
Eames, B. Frank
author_sort Ashique, Amir M.
collection PubMed
description Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro‐CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of “reduced bone”: bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non‐icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non‐icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, “reduced bone” in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that “reduced bone” in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non‐icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86551732021-12-20 Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids Ashique, Amir M. Atake, Oghenevwogaga J. Ovens, Katie Guo, Ruiyi Pratt, Isaac V. Detrich, H. William Cooper, David M. L. Desvignes, Thomas Postlethwait, John H. Eames, B. Frank J Anat Original Papers Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro‐CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of “reduced bone”: bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non‐icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non‐icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, “reduced bone” in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that “reduced bone” in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non‐icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-22 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8655173/ /pubmed/34423431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Ashique, Amir M.
Atake, Oghenevwogaga J.
Ovens, Katie
Guo, Ruiyi
Pratt, Isaac V.
Detrich, H. William
Cooper, David M. L.
Desvignes, Thomas
Postlethwait, John H.
Eames, B. Frank
Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title_full Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title_fullStr Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title_full_unstemmed Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title_short Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
title_sort bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in antarctic icefishes and related antarctic notothenioids
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537
work_keys_str_mv AT ashiqueamirm bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT atakeoghenevwogagaj bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT ovenskatie bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT guoruiyi bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT prattisaacv bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT detrichhwilliam bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT cooperdavidml bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT desvignesthomas bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT postlethwaitjohnh bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids
AT eamesbfrank bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids