Cargando…
Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids
Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anato...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537 |
_version_ | 1784612023548510208 |
---|---|
author | Ashique, Amir M. Atake, Oghenevwogaga J. Ovens, Katie Guo, Ruiyi Pratt, Isaac V. Detrich, H. William Cooper, David M. L. Desvignes, Thomas Postlethwait, John H. Eames, B. Frank |
author_facet | Ashique, Amir M. Atake, Oghenevwogaga J. Ovens, Katie Guo, Ruiyi Pratt, Isaac V. Detrich, H. William Cooper, David M. L. Desvignes, Thomas Postlethwait, John H. Eames, B. Frank |
author_sort | Ashique, Amir M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro‐CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of “reduced bone”: bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non‐icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non‐icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, “reduced bone” in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that “reduced bone” in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non‐icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8655173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86551732021-12-20 Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids Ashique, Amir M. Atake, Oghenevwogaga J. Ovens, Katie Guo, Ruiyi Pratt, Isaac V. Detrich, H. William Cooper, David M. L. Desvignes, Thomas Postlethwait, John H. Eames, B. Frank J Anat Original Papers Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with “reduced bone,” which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro‐CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of “reduced bone”: bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non‐icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non‐icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, “reduced bone” in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that “reduced bone” in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non‐icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-22 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8655173/ /pubmed/34423431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Ashique, Amir M. Atake, Oghenevwogaga J. Ovens, Katie Guo, Ruiyi Pratt, Isaac V. Detrich, H. William Cooper, David M. L. Desvignes, Thomas Postlethwait, John H. Eames, B. Frank Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title | Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title_full | Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title_fullStr | Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title_short | Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids |
title_sort | bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in antarctic icefishes and related antarctic notothenioids |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashiqueamirm bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT atakeoghenevwogagaj bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT ovenskatie bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT guoruiyi bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT prattisaacv bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT detrichhwilliam bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT cooperdavidml bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT desvignesthomas bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT postlethwaitjohnh bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids AT eamesbfrank bonemicrostructureandbonemineraldensityarenotsystemicallydifferentinantarcticicefishesandrelatedantarcticnotothenioids |