Cargando…

Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Information technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with dementia and informal carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia and informal carers would benefit from technology-based counselling. However, it remains unclear which features of those inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirt, Julian, Langer, Gero, Wilde, Fabian, Bauernschmidt, Dorothee, Meyer, Gabriele, Bieber, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157
_version_ 1784612100882038784
author Hirt, Julian
Langer, Gero
Wilde, Fabian
Bauernschmidt, Dorothee
Meyer, Gabriele
Bieber, Anja
author_facet Hirt, Julian
Langer, Gero
Wilde, Fabian
Bauernschmidt, Dorothee
Meyer, Gabriele
Bieber, Anja
author_sort Hirt, Julian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Information technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with dementia and informal carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia and informal carers would benefit from technology-based counselling. However, it remains unclear which features of those interventions relate to beneficial outcomes and which aspects are necessary for a successful implementation. Therefore, the primary objectives are: (1) to identify conditions of successful implementation of technology-based counselling interventions in dementia and (2) to investigate the effectiveness of those interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review. The first primary objective requires evidence from various study designs addressing aspects on effective and non-effective implementation of technology-based counselling. This could be telephone-based, web-based or mobile-based interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. For the second primary objective, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with any outcomes will be included. Year of publication and language will not be restricted. We will search CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science up to April 2021. Additionally, we will perform web searching and citation tracking. To achieve the first primary objective, a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) will be conducted. The QCA enables us to identify necessary or sufficient components for a successful implementation. To reach the second primary objective, a meta-analysis will be performed with respect to potential clinical and statistical heterogeneity of RCTs. The revised Risk of Bias tool 2.0 will be used to check the risk of bias in RCTs. For all other study designs, the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review. We will disseminate our findings through scientific and non-scientific journal articles and conference presentations as well as formats directed to the public and decision-makers in healthcare. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245473.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86555682021-12-27 Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis Hirt, Julian Langer, Gero Wilde, Fabian Bauernschmidt, Dorothee Meyer, Gabriele Bieber, Anja BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Information technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with dementia and informal carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia and informal carers would benefit from technology-based counselling. However, it remains unclear which features of those interventions relate to beneficial outcomes and which aspects are necessary for a successful implementation. Therefore, the primary objectives are: (1) to identify conditions of successful implementation of technology-based counselling interventions in dementia and (2) to investigate the effectiveness of those interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review. The first primary objective requires evidence from various study designs addressing aspects on effective and non-effective implementation of technology-based counselling. This could be telephone-based, web-based or mobile-based interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. For the second primary objective, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with any outcomes will be included. Year of publication and language will not be restricted. We will search CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science up to April 2021. Additionally, we will perform web searching and citation tracking. To achieve the first primary objective, a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) will be conducted. The QCA enables us to identify necessary or sufficient components for a successful implementation. To reach the second primary objective, a meta-analysis will be performed with respect to potential clinical and statistical heterogeneity of RCTs. The revised Risk of Bias tool 2.0 will be used to check the risk of bias in RCTs. For all other study designs, the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review. We will disseminate our findings through scientific and non-scientific journal articles and conference presentations as well as formats directed to the public and decision-makers in healthcare. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245473. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8655568/ /pubmed/34880025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Hirt, Julian
Langer, Gero
Wilde, Fabian
Bauernschmidt, Dorothee
Meyer, Gabriele
Bieber, Anja
Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title_full Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title_short Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
title_sort technology-based counselling in dementia (tecodem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157
work_keys_str_mv AT hirtjulian technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis
AT langergero technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis
AT wildefabian technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis
AT bauernschmidtdorothee technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis
AT meyergabriele technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis
AT bieberanja technologybasedcounsellingindementiatecodemstudyprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysisandmetaanalysis