Cargando…
Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the fact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239 |
_version_ | 1784612104201830400 |
---|---|
author | Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Manton, Dave Harrison-White, Stephanie Klaber, Robert Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik |
author_facet | Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Manton, Dave Harrison-White, Stephanie Klaber, Robert Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik |
author_sort | Khanbhai, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the factors that promote and limit the effective use of FFT as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred QI. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large London NHS Trust. Services include accident and emergency, inpatient, outpatient and maternity, which routinely collect FFT patient experience data. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare staff and key stakeholders involved in FFT. INTERVENTIONS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 15 participants from a broad range of professional groups to evaluate their engagement with the FFT. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed for using deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concerns related to inefficiency in the flow of FFT data, lack of time to analyse FFT reports (with emphasis on high level reporting rather than QI), insufficient access to FFT reports and limited training provided to understand FFT reports for frontline staff. The sheer volume of data received was not amenable to manual thematic analysis resulting in inability to acquire insight from the free text. This resulted in staff ambivalence towards FFT as a near real-time feedback initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The results state that there is too much FFT free text for meaningful analysis, and the output is limited to the provision of sufficient capacity and resource to analyse the data, without consideration of other options, such as text analytics and amending the data collection tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8655585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86555852021-12-27 Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Manton, Dave Harrison-White, Stephanie Klaber, Robert Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the factors that promote and limit the effective use of FFT as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred QI. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large London NHS Trust. Services include accident and emergency, inpatient, outpatient and maternity, which routinely collect FFT patient experience data. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare staff and key stakeholders involved in FFT. INTERVENTIONS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 15 participants from a broad range of professional groups to evaluate their engagement with the FFT. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed for using deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concerns related to inefficiency in the flow of FFT data, lack of time to analyse FFT reports (with emphasis on high level reporting rather than QI), insufficient access to FFT reports and limited training provided to understand FFT reports for frontline staff. The sheer volume of data received was not amenable to manual thematic analysis resulting in inability to acquire insight from the free text. This resulted in staff ambivalence towards FFT as a near real-time feedback initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The results state that there is too much FFT free text for meaningful analysis, and the output is limited to the provision of sufficient capacity and resource to analyse the data, without consideration of other options, such as text analytics and amending the data collection tool. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8655585/ /pubmed/34880009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Manton, Dave Harrison-White, Stephanie Klaber, Robert Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title | Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title_full | Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title_fullStr | Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title_short | Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
title_sort | identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanbhaimustafa identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT flottkelsey identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT mantondave identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT harrisonwhitestephanie identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT klaberrobert identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT darziara identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare AT mayererik identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare |