Cargando…

Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care

OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanbhai, Mustafa, Flott, Kelsey, Manton, Dave, Harrison-White, Stephanie, Klaber, Robert, Darzi, Ara, Mayer, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239
_version_ 1784612104201830400
author Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Manton, Dave
Harrison-White, Stephanie
Klaber, Robert
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
author_facet Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Manton, Dave
Harrison-White, Stephanie
Klaber, Robert
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
author_sort Khanbhai, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the factors that promote and limit the effective use of FFT as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred QI. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large London NHS Trust. Services include accident and emergency, inpatient, outpatient and maternity, which routinely collect FFT patient experience data. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare staff and key stakeholders involved in FFT. INTERVENTIONS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 15 participants from a broad range of professional groups to evaluate their engagement with the FFT. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed for using deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concerns related to inefficiency in the flow of FFT data, lack of time to analyse FFT reports (with emphasis on high level reporting rather than QI), insufficient access to FFT reports and limited training provided to understand FFT reports for frontline staff. The sheer volume of data received was not amenable to manual thematic analysis resulting in inability to acquire insight from the free text. This resulted in staff ambivalence towards FFT as a near real-time feedback initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The results state that there is too much FFT free text for meaningful analysis, and the output is limited to the provision of sufficient capacity and resource to analyse the data, without consideration of other options, such as text analytics and amending the data collection tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86555852021-12-27 Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Manton, Dave Harrison-White, Stephanie Klaber, Robert Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the factors that promote and limit the effective use of FFT as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred QI. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large London NHS Trust. Services include accident and emergency, inpatient, outpatient and maternity, which routinely collect FFT patient experience data. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare staff and key stakeholders involved in FFT. INTERVENTIONS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 15 participants from a broad range of professional groups to evaluate their engagement with the FFT. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed for using deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concerns related to inefficiency in the flow of FFT data, lack of time to analyse FFT reports (with emphasis on high level reporting rather than QI), insufficient access to FFT reports and limited training provided to understand FFT reports for frontline staff. The sheer volume of data received was not amenable to manual thematic analysis resulting in inability to acquire insight from the free text. This resulted in staff ambivalence towards FFT as a near real-time feedback initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The results state that there is too much FFT free text for meaningful analysis, and the output is limited to the provision of sufficient capacity and resource to analyse the data, without consideration of other options, such as text analytics and amending the data collection tool. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8655585/ /pubmed/34880009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Manton, Dave
Harrison-White, Stephanie
Klaber, Robert
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title_full Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title_fullStr Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title_full_unstemmed Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title_short Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
title_sort identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047239
work_keys_str_mv AT khanbhaimustafa identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT flottkelsey identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT mantondave identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT harrisonwhitestephanie identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT klaberrobert identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT darziara identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare
AT mayererik identifyingfactorsthatpromoteandlimittheeffectiveuseofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbackamixedmethodsstudyinsecondarycare