Cargando…

Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapists implemented telephone follow‐up (TFU) in 2015 as an additional point of care post‐treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether TFU identified patients who required additional post‐treatment care before the next scheduled review. METHODS: Between Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najem, Fadila, Prosser, Susan, Harris, Jill, Beldham‐Collins, Rachael, Cross, Shamira, West, Katrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.521
_version_ 1784612137382969344
author Najem, Fadila
Prosser, Susan
Harris, Jill
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Cross, Shamira
West, Katrina
author_facet Najem, Fadila
Prosser, Susan
Harris, Jill
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Cross, Shamira
West, Katrina
author_sort Najem, Fadila
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapists implemented telephone follow‐up (TFU) in 2015 as an additional point of care post‐treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether TFU identified patients who required additional post‐treatment care before the next scheduled review. METHODS: Between January 2015 and July 2016, all patients who were prescribed curative intent treatment aged 18 years or over were called 10 days post‐radiation therapy (RT). Eight questions were developed and included asking patients how they were coping, if their side effects were improving, if they needed to contact the hospital and if more dressings were required. Patients who could not be contacted after two attempts were excluded from the study. Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) were used to analyse the responses. RESULTS: Data were collected from 850 patients. A total of 28/846 (3%) of patients reported they were not coping after RT, with 26/830 (3%) reporting their side effects were getting worse. A total of 97/826 (12%) of patients felt they needed to contact the hospital because they were unwell. This study identified 104/677 (15%) of patients who responded required more dressings, with 67/104 (65.7%) and 10/104 (9.8%) of this cohort identified in the breast, and head and neck groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapist‐led TFU has shown to be beneficial in identifying a small cohort of breast and head and neck cancer patients who required additional care post‐radiation treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86557542021-12-20 Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care Najem, Fadila Prosser, Susan Harris, Jill Beldham‐Collins, Rachael Cross, Shamira West, Katrina J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapists implemented telephone follow‐up (TFU) in 2015 as an additional point of care post‐treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether TFU identified patients who required additional post‐treatment care before the next scheduled review. METHODS: Between January 2015 and July 2016, all patients who were prescribed curative intent treatment aged 18 years or over were called 10 days post‐radiation therapy (RT). Eight questions were developed and included asking patients how they were coping, if their side effects were improving, if they needed to contact the hospital and if more dressings were required. Patients who could not be contacted after two attempts were excluded from the study. Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) were used to analyse the responses. RESULTS: Data were collected from 850 patients. A total of 28/846 (3%) of patients reported they were not coping after RT, with 26/830 (3%) reporting their side effects were getting worse. A total of 97/826 (12%) of patients felt they needed to contact the hospital because they were unwell. This study identified 104/677 (15%) of patients who responded required more dressings, with 67/104 (65.7%) and 10/104 (9.8%) of this cohort identified in the breast, and head and neck groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapist‐led TFU has shown to be beneficial in identifying a small cohort of breast and head and neck cancer patients who required additional care post‐radiation treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-16 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8655754/ /pubmed/34132066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.521 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Najem, Fadila
Prosser, Susan
Harris, Jill
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Cross, Shamira
West, Katrina
Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title_full Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title_fullStr Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title_short Radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
title_sort radiation therapist‐led telephone follow‐up: identifying patients who require post‐treatment care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.521
work_keys_str_mv AT najemfadila radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare
AT prossersusan radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare
AT harrisjill radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare
AT beldhamcollinsrachael radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare
AT crossshamira radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare
AT westkatrina radiationtherapistledtelephonefollowupidentifyingpatientswhorequireposttreatmentcare