Cargando…
Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
[Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752 |
_version_ | 1784612138310959104 |
---|---|
author | Tavazza, Francesca DeCost, Brian Choudhary, Kamal |
author_facet | Tavazza, Francesca DeCost, Brian Choudhary, Kamal |
author_sort | Tavazza, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, prediction intervals, i.e., the evaluation of the uncertainty on each prediction, are not as frequently available. In this work, we compare three different approaches to obtain such individual uncertainty, testing them on 12 ML-physical properties. Specifically, we investigated using the quantile loss function, machine learning the prediction intervals directly, and using Gaussian processes. We identify each approach’s advantages and disadvantages and end up slightly favoring the modeling of the individual uncertainties directly, as it is the easiest to fit and, in most of the cases, minimizes over- and underestimation of the predicted errors. All data for training and testing were taken from the publicly available JARVIS-DFT database, and the codes developed for computing the prediction intervals are available through the JARVIS-tools package. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8655759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86557592021-12-10 Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties Tavazza, Francesca DeCost, Brian Choudhary, Kamal ACS Omega [Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, prediction intervals, i.e., the evaluation of the uncertainty on each prediction, are not as frequently available. In this work, we compare three different approaches to obtain such individual uncertainty, testing them on 12 ML-physical properties. Specifically, we investigated using the quantile loss function, machine learning the prediction intervals directly, and using Gaussian processes. We identify each approach’s advantages and disadvantages and end up slightly favoring the modeling of the individual uncertainties directly, as it is the easiest to fit and, in most of the cases, minimizes over- and underestimation of the predicted errors. All data for training and testing were taken from the publicly available JARVIS-DFT database, and the codes developed for computing the prediction intervals are available through the JARVIS-tools package. American Chemical Society 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8655759/ /pubmed/34901594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752 Text en Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 2021 by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Tavazza, Francesca DeCost, Brian Choudhary, Kamal Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties |
title | Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models
of Material Properties |
title_full | Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models
of Material Properties |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models
of Material Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models
of Material Properties |
title_short | Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models
of Material Properties |
title_sort | uncertainty prediction for machine learning models
of material properties |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tavazzafrancesca uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties AT decostbrian uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties AT choudharykamal uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties |