Cargando…

Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties

[Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavazza, Francesca, DeCost, Brian, Choudhary, Kamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752
_version_ 1784612138310959104
author Tavazza, Francesca
DeCost, Brian
Choudhary, Kamal
author_facet Tavazza, Francesca
DeCost, Brian
Choudhary, Kamal
author_sort Tavazza, Francesca
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, prediction intervals, i.e., the evaluation of the uncertainty on each prediction, are not as frequently available. In this work, we compare three different approaches to obtain such individual uncertainty, testing them on 12 ML-physical properties. Specifically, we investigated using the quantile loss function, machine learning the prediction intervals directly, and using Gaussian processes. We identify each approach’s advantages and disadvantages and end up slightly favoring the modeling of the individual uncertainties directly, as it is the easiest to fit and, in most of the cases, minimizes over- and underestimation of the predicted errors. All data for training and testing were taken from the publicly available JARVIS-DFT database, and the codes developed for computing the prediction intervals are available through the JARVIS-tools package.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8655759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86557592021-12-10 Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties Tavazza, Francesca DeCost, Brian Choudhary, Kamal ACS Omega [Image: see text] Uncertainty quantification in artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in materials science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, prediction intervals, i.e., the evaluation of the uncertainty on each prediction, are not as frequently available. In this work, we compare three different approaches to obtain such individual uncertainty, testing them on 12 ML-physical properties. Specifically, we investigated using the quantile loss function, machine learning the prediction intervals directly, and using Gaussian processes. We identify each approach’s advantages and disadvantages and end up slightly favoring the modeling of the individual uncertainties directly, as it is the easiest to fit and, in most of the cases, minimizes over- and underestimation of the predicted errors. All data for training and testing were taken from the publicly available JARVIS-DFT database, and the codes developed for computing the prediction intervals are available through the JARVIS-tools package. American Chemical Society 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8655759/ /pubmed/34901594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752 Text en Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 2021 by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Tavazza, Francesca
DeCost, Brian
Choudhary, Kamal
Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title_full Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title_fullStr Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title_short Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
title_sort uncertainty prediction for machine learning models of material properties
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03752
work_keys_str_mv AT tavazzafrancesca uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties
AT decostbrian uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties
AT choudharykamal uncertaintypredictionformachinelearningmodelsofmaterialproperties