Cargando…

Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results of hand-held and table-mounted autorefractors. METHODS: We designed this study as an observational, cross-sectional study. We compared the mean spheric and cylinder power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder values, determined the limits of agre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabulut, Müjdat, Karabulut, Sinem, Karalezli, Aylin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34879852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5
_version_ 1784612205156630528
author Karabulut, Müjdat
Karabulut, Sinem
Karalezli, Aylin
author_facet Karabulut, Müjdat
Karabulut, Sinem
Karalezli, Aylin
author_sort Karabulut, Müjdat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results of hand-held and table-mounted autorefractors. METHODS: We designed this study as an observational, cross-sectional study. We compared the mean spheric and cylinder power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder values, determined the limits of agreement (LoA), and evaluated the reliability of two autorefractors. RESULTS: We evaluated 256 eyes of 256 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.12 ± 2.26 years; range, 5–16 years). 49% of the patients were female, and 51% were male. The Nidek HandyRef-K autorefractor measured relatively more astigmatism (P < 0.001) and less hyperopia (P = 0.024). The mean differences and 95% LoA were 0.06 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.82 D to 0.98 D) in spherical power, 0.08 D ± 0.28 D (− 0.47 D to 0.64 D) in cylindrical power, 0.11 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.81 D to 1.01 D) in spherical equivalent, 0.02 D ± 0.36 D (− 0.73 D to 0.69 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 0.005 D ± 0.54 D (− 1.07 D to 1.06 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°(.) We found the difference within 0.50 D in 244 (95%) eyes for spherical power, in 245 (96%) eyes for cylindrical power, 228 (89%) eyes for spherical equivalent, 224 (87%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 213 (83%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°(.) When comparing devices, there were strong correlations for spherical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.99, P < 0.001), cylindrical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.88, P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (Spearman’s rho = 0.98, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Two autorefractors showed clinically applicable agreement limits; excellent reliability for spherical power and spherical equivalent and good reliability for cylindrical power; high positive percent agreement for spherical and cylindrical power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°and 45°. These results showed that both devices might be used interchangeably for screening of refractive error in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8656057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86560572021-12-10 Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study Karabulut, Müjdat Karabulut, Sinem Karalezli, Aylin BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results of hand-held and table-mounted autorefractors. METHODS: We designed this study as an observational, cross-sectional study. We compared the mean spheric and cylinder power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder values, determined the limits of agreement (LoA), and evaluated the reliability of two autorefractors. RESULTS: We evaluated 256 eyes of 256 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.12 ± 2.26 years; range, 5–16 years). 49% of the patients were female, and 51% were male. The Nidek HandyRef-K autorefractor measured relatively more astigmatism (P < 0.001) and less hyperopia (P = 0.024). The mean differences and 95% LoA were 0.06 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.82 D to 0.98 D) in spherical power, 0.08 D ± 0.28 D (− 0.47 D to 0.64 D) in cylindrical power, 0.11 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.81 D to 1.01 D) in spherical equivalent, 0.02 D ± 0.36 D (− 0.73 D to 0.69 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 0.005 D ± 0.54 D (− 1.07 D to 1.06 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°(.) We found the difference within 0.50 D in 244 (95%) eyes for spherical power, in 245 (96%) eyes for cylindrical power, 228 (89%) eyes for spherical equivalent, 224 (87%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 213 (83%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°(.) When comparing devices, there were strong correlations for spherical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.99, P < 0.001), cylindrical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.88, P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (Spearman’s rho = 0.98, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Two autorefractors showed clinically applicable agreement limits; excellent reliability for spherical power and spherical equivalent and good reliability for cylindrical power; high positive percent agreement for spherical and cylindrical power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°and 45°. These results showed that both devices might be used interchangeably for screening of refractive error in children. BioMed Central 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8656057/ /pubmed/34879852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Karabulut, Müjdat
Karabulut, Sinem
Karalezli, Aylin
Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title_full Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title_short Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
title_sort refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34879852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5
work_keys_str_mv AT karabulutmujdat refractiveoutcomesoftablemountedandhandheldautorefractometersinchildrenanobservationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT karabulutsinem refractiveoutcomesoftablemountedandhandheldautorefractometersinchildrenanobservationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT karalezliaylin refractiveoutcomesoftablemountedandhandheldautorefractometersinchildrenanobservationalcrosssectionalstudy