Cargando…

Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been accepted as an effective curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and has resulted in better survival outcomes than radical cystectomy or a cisplatin-based regimen. In the present study, we aimed to compare the two most commonly use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Tiange, Wu, Yuqing, Chen, Shuqiu, Wu, Jianping, Zhu, Weidong, Liu, Hui, Chen, Ming, Xu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.678896
_version_ 1784612257743765504
author Wu, Tiange
Wu, Yuqing
Chen, Shuqiu
Wu, Jianping
Zhu, Weidong
Liu, Hui
Chen, Ming
Xu, Bin
author_facet Wu, Tiange
Wu, Yuqing
Chen, Shuqiu
Wu, Jianping
Zhu, Weidong
Liu, Hui
Chen, Ming
Xu, Bin
author_sort Wu, Tiange
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been accepted as an effective curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and has resulted in better survival outcomes than radical cystectomy or a cisplatin-based regimen. In the present study, we aimed to compare the two most commonly used cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapies, gemcitabine plus cisplatin and methotrexate plus vinblastine plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin, by summarizing and analyzing clinical data and outcomes of published research. METHODS: We searched for qualified studies that compared these two types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 14 retrospective studies. Data and information on pathological responses and long-term survival studies were extracted and analyzed separately. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies with 3116 patients were selected from 1188 studies, which contained data on pathological complete response, pathological partial response, and overall survival. In contrast to the results of previous studies, there was no significant difference in pathological complete response (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.15), pathological partial response (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.14), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.17) between GC and MVAC in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed between GC and MVAC in the muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes. The priority selection of GC or MVAC in the clinic should be guided by further investigation, and the clinical standard strategy still counts on the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8656312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86563122021-12-10 Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wu, Tiange Wu, Yuqing Chen, Shuqiu Wu, Jianping Zhu, Weidong Liu, Hui Chen, Ming Xu, Bin Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been accepted as an effective curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and has resulted in better survival outcomes than radical cystectomy or a cisplatin-based regimen. In the present study, we aimed to compare the two most commonly used cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapies, gemcitabine plus cisplatin and methotrexate plus vinblastine plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin, by summarizing and analyzing clinical data and outcomes of published research. METHODS: We searched for qualified studies that compared these two types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 14 retrospective studies. Data and information on pathological responses and long-term survival studies were extracted and analyzed separately. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies with 3116 patients were selected from 1188 studies, which contained data on pathological complete response, pathological partial response, and overall survival. In contrast to the results of previous studies, there was no significant difference in pathological complete response (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.15), pathological partial response (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.14), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.17) between GC and MVAC in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed between GC and MVAC in the muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes due to the similar curative effect and parallel long survival outcomes. The priority selection of GC or MVAC in the clinic should be guided by further investigation, and the clinical standard strategy still counts on the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8656312/ /pubmed/34900663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.678896 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu, Wu, Chen, Wu, Zhu, Liu, Chen and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wu, Tiange
Wu, Yuqing
Chen, Shuqiu
Wu, Jianping
Zhu, Weidong
Liu, Hui
Chen, Ming
Xu, Bin
Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort curative effect and survival assessment comparing gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.678896
work_keys_str_mv AT wutiange curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyuqing curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenshuqiu curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujianping curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuweidong curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhui curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenming curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xubin curativeeffectandsurvivalassessmentcomparinggemcitabineandcisplatinversusmethotrexatevinblastinedoxorubicinandcisplatinasneoadjuvanttherapyforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis