Cargando…
ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization
STUDY QUESTION: What are the good practices for the use of ADD-ON Treatments in IVF cycles in INDIA? WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Add on treatments in IVF are procedures and technologies which are offered to patients in hope of improving the success rates. A lot of add on treatments exist; most of them ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975243 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.330501 |
_version_ | 1784612258762981376 |
---|---|
author | Malhotra, Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Kamat, Sudesh Mishra, Akansha Chatterjee, Charulata Nair, Seema Ghosh, Pranay Mehta, Rajvi Bhadraka, Harsha Srinivas, Sapna Kumar, Lalith Mistry, Rushika Goenka, Deepak Kant, Gaurav |
author_facet | Malhotra, Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Kamat, Sudesh Mishra, Akansha Chatterjee, Charulata Nair, Seema Ghosh, Pranay Mehta, Rajvi Bhadraka, Harsha Srinivas, Sapna Kumar, Lalith Mistry, Rushika Goenka, Deepak Kant, Gaurav |
author_sort | Malhotra, Jaideep |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY QUESTION: What are the good practices for the use of ADD-ON Treatments in IVF cycles in INDIA? WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Add on treatments in IVF are procedures and technologies which are offered to patients in hope of improving the success rates. A lot of add on treatments exist; most of them have limited evidence and data for the Indian patient population is miniscule. These interventions may have limited effects, so it is imperative that any new technology that is offered is evaluated properly and has enough evidence to suggest that it is safe and effective. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on Add on treatments in IVF in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Expert professionals from ISAR representing clinical and embryology fields. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The report is divided in various components including the health of the Offspring, the various ADD ons available to an ART center, consensus points for each technology & qualifications and trainings for embryologists, the report and recommendations of the expert panel reflect the discussion on each of the topics and try to lay down good practice points for labs to follow. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The recommendations are solely based on expert opinion. Future availability of data may warrant an update of the same. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These guidelines can help labs across the country to standardise their ART services and improve clinical outcomes, it will also motivate clinics to collect data and report the use of Add ons to the national registry. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from CooperSurgical India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8656316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86563162021-12-30 ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization Malhotra, Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Kamat, Sudesh Mishra, Akansha Chatterjee, Charulata Nair, Seema Ghosh, Pranay Mehta, Rajvi Bhadraka, Harsha Srinivas, Sapna Kumar, Lalith Mistry, Rushika Goenka, Deepak Kant, Gaurav J Hum Reprod Sci Recommendations STUDY QUESTION: What are the good practices for the use of ADD-ON Treatments in IVF cycles in INDIA? WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Add on treatments in IVF are procedures and technologies which are offered to patients in hope of improving the success rates. A lot of add on treatments exist; most of them have limited evidence and data for the Indian patient population is miniscule. These interventions may have limited effects, so it is imperative that any new technology that is offered is evaluated properly and has enough evidence to suggest that it is safe and effective. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on Add on treatments in IVF in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Expert professionals from ISAR representing clinical and embryology fields. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The report is divided in various components including the health of the Offspring, the various ADD ons available to an ART center, consensus points for each technology & qualifications and trainings for embryologists, the report and recommendations of the expert panel reflect the discussion on each of the topics and try to lay down good practice points for labs to follow. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The recommendations are solely based on expert opinion. Future availability of data may warrant an update of the same. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These guidelines can help labs across the country to standardise their ART services and improve clinical outcomes, it will also motivate clinics to collect data and report the use of Add ons to the national registry. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from CooperSurgical India. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8656316/ /pubmed/34975243 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.330501 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Recommendations Malhotra, Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Kamat, Sudesh Mishra, Akansha Chatterjee, Charulata Nair, Seema Ghosh, Pranay Mehta, Rajvi Bhadraka, Harsha Srinivas, Sapna Kumar, Lalith Mistry, Rushika Goenka, Deepak Kant, Gaurav ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title | ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title_full | ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title_fullStr | ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title_full_unstemmed | ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title_short | ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment in In vitro Fertilization |
title_sort | isar consensus guidelines on add-ons treatment in in vitro fertilization |
topic | Recommendations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975243 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.330501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malhotrajaideep isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT malhotrakeshav isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT kamatsudesh isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT mishraakansha isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT chatterjeecharulata isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT nairseema isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT ghoshpranay isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT mehtarajvi isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT bhadrakaharsha isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT srinivassapna isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT kumarlalith isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT mistryrushika isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT goenkadeepak isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization AT kantgaurav isarconsensusguidelinesonaddonstreatmentininvitrofertilization |