Cargando…
Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238 |
_version_ | 1784612271566094336 |
---|---|
author | Sijbom, Roy B. L. Koen, Jessie |
author_facet | Sijbom, Roy B. L. Koen, Jessie |
author_sort | Sijbom, Roy B. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practices, whereas prohibitive voice refers to the expression of concerns about practices and behaviors that are detrimental. In Study 1 (N = 121), confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) provided evidence for the two-factor structure, which was replicated in the other two studies. In Study 2 (N(T1) = 209/N(T2) = 107), we investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale, and tested measurement invariance across gender and time. Results provided validity evidence, partial scalar invariance for gender, and scalar invariance across time. In Study 3 (N = 149), we expanded the nomological network of the promotive and prohibitive voice scales through their relationship with personal initiative, approach temperament, and risk propensity. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence for the validity of the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8656393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86563932021-12-10 Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale Sijbom, Roy B. L. Koen, Jessie Front Psychol Psychology The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practices, whereas prohibitive voice refers to the expression of concerns about practices and behaviors that are detrimental. In Study 1 (N = 121), confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) provided evidence for the two-factor structure, which was replicated in the other two studies. In Study 2 (N(T1) = 209/N(T2) = 107), we investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale, and tested measurement invariance across gender and time. Results provided validity evidence, partial scalar invariance for gender, and scalar invariance across time. In Study 3 (N = 149), we expanded the nomological network of the promotive and prohibitive voice scales through their relationship with personal initiative, approach temperament, and risk propensity. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence for the validity of the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8656393/ /pubmed/34899466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sijbom and Koen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Sijbom, Roy B. L. Koen, Jessie Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title | Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title_full | Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title_short | Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale |
title_sort | psychometric validation of the dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sijbomroybl psychometricvalidationofthedutchversionofthepromotiveandprohibitivevoicescale AT koenjessie psychometricvalidationofthedutchversionofthepromotiveandprohibitivevoicescale |