Cargando…

Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Michelle, Bruns, Anke, Kuball, Jürgen, Raijmakers, Reinier, van Baarle, Debbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140
_version_ 1784612290504425472
author Janssen, Michelle
Bruns, Anke
Kuball, Jürgen
Raijmakers, Reinier
van Baarle, Debbie
author_facet Janssen, Michelle
Bruns, Anke
Kuball, Jürgen
Raijmakers, Reinier
van Baarle, Debbie
author_sort Janssen, Michelle
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient. ABSTRACT: Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8656479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86564792021-12-10 Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review Janssen, Michelle Bruns, Anke Kuball, Jürgen Raijmakers, Reinier van Baarle, Debbie Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient. ABSTRACT: Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses. MDPI 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8656479/ /pubmed/34885251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Janssen, Michelle
Bruns, Anke
Kuball, Jürgen
Raijmakers, Reinier
van Baarle, Debbie
Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title_full Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title_short Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
title_sort vaccine responses in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a comprehensive review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenmichelle vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview
AT brunsanke vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview
AT kuballjurgen vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview
AT raijmakersreinier vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview
AT vanbaarledebbie vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview