Cargando…
Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140 |
_version_ | 1784612290504425472 |
---|---|
author | Janssen, Michelle Bruns, Anke Kuball, Jürgen Raijmakers, Reinier van Baarle, Debbie |
author_facet | Janssen, Michelle Bruns, Anke Kuball, Jürgen Raijmakers, Reinier van Baarle, Debbie |
author_sort | Janssen, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient. ABSTRACT: Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8656479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86564792021-12-10 Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review Janssen, Michelle Bruns, Anke Kuball, Jürgen Raijmakers, Reinier van Baarle, Debbie Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient. ABSTRACT: Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses. MDPI 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8656479/ /pubmed/34885251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Janssen, Michelle Bruns, Anke Kuball, Jürgen Raijmakers, Reinier van Baarle, Debbie Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title | Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title_full | Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title_fullStr | Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title_short | Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review |
title_sort | vaccine responses in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a comprehensive review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenmichelle vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview AT brunsanke vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview AT kuballjurgen vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview AT raijmakersreinier vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview AT vanbaarledebbie vaccineresponsesinadulthematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientsacomprehensivereview |