Cargando…

Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies

In manufacturing companies, cognitive processing is required from assembly workers to perform correct and timely assembly of complex products, often with varied specifications and high quality demands. This paper explores assembly operators’ perceptions of cognitive/mental workload to provide a holi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wollter Bergman, Matilda, Berlin, Cecilia, Babapour Chafi, Maral, Falck, Ann-Christine, Örtengren, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34886007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312282
_version_ 1784612291098968064
author Wollter Bergman, Matilda
Berlin, Cecilia
Babapour Chafi, Maral
Falck, Ann-Christine
Örtengren, Roland
author_facet Wollter Bergman, Matilda
Berlin, Cecilia
Babapour Chafi, Maral
Falck, Ann-Christine
Örtengren, Roland
author_sort Wollter Bergman, Matilda
collection PubMed
description In manufacturing companies, cognitive processing is required from assembly workers to perform correct and timely assembly of complex products, often with varied specifications and high quality demands. This paper explores assembly operators’ perceptions of cognitive/mental workload to provide a holistic understanding of the work conditions that affect cognitive demands and performance. While the physical loading aspects of assembly work are well known, most empirical literature dealing with cognitive/mental loading in manufacturing tends to examine a few particular aspects, rather than address the issue with a holistic system view. This semi-structured interview study, involving 50 industrial assembly operators from three Swedish companies, explores how assemblers perceive that their cognitive performance and well-being is influenced by a wide variety of factors within the context of mechanical product assembly. The interview transcripts were analysed using a priori coding, followed by bottom-up Thematic Analysis. The results indicate that a variety of systemic effects on assemblers’ cognitive performance can be classified as job demands or resources. Quite often, the absence of a resource mirrors a related demand, and “good assembly conditions”, as described by the interviewees, often re-frame demands as desirable challenges that foster motivation and positive feelings towards the work. The identified demands and resources stem from task design, timing, physical loading, intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, social teamwork and the product’s “interface” design. Despite organisational differences and conditions between the three companies that took part in the study, the results are largely consistent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8656480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86564802021-12-10 Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies Wollter Bergman, Matilda Berlin, Cecilia Babapour Chafi, Maral Falck, Ann-Christine Örtengren, Roland Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In manufacturing companies, cognitive processing is required from assembly workers to perform correct and timely assembly of complex products, often with varied specifications and high quality demands. This paper explores assembly operators’ perceptions of cognitive/mental workload to provide a holistic understanding of the work conditions that affect cognitive demands and performance. While the physical loading aspects of assembly work are well known, most empirical literature dealing with cognitive/mental loading in manufacturing tends to examine a few particular aspects, rather than address the issue with a holistic system view. This semi-structured interview study, involving 50 industrial assembly operators from three Swedish companies, explores how assemblers perceive that their cognitive performance and well-being is influenced by a wide variety of factors within the context of mechanical product assembly. The interview transcripts were analysed using a priori coding, followed by bottom-up Thematic Analysis. The results indicate that a variety of systemic effects on assemblers’ cognitive performance can be classified as job demands or resources. Quite often, the absence of a resource mirrors a related demand, and “good assembly conditions”, as described by the interviewees, often re-frame demands as desirable challenges that foster motivation and positive feelings towards the work. The identified demands and resources stem from task design, timing, physical loading, intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, social teamwork and the product’s “interface” design. Despite organisational differences and conditions between the three companies that took part in the study, the results are largely consistent. MDPI 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8656480/ /pubmed/34886007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312282 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wollter Bergman, Matilda
Berlin, Cecilia
Babapour Chafi, Maral
Falck, Ann-Christine
Örtengren, Roland
Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title_full Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title_fullStr Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title_short Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies
title_sort cognitive ergonomics of assembly work from a job demands–resources perspective: three qualitative case studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34886007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312282
work_keys_str_mv AT wollterbergmanmatilda cognitiveergonomicsofassemblyworkfromajobdemandsresourcesperspectivethreequalitativecasestudies
AT berlincecilia cognitiveergonomicsofassemblyworkfromajobdemandsresourcesperspectivethreequalitativecasestudies
AT babapourchafimaral cognitiveergonomicsofassemblyworkfromajobdemandsresourcesperspectivethreequalitativecasestudies
AT falckannchristine cognitiveergonomicsofassemblyworkfromajobdemandsresourcesperspectivethreequalitativecasestudies
AT ortengrenroland cognitiveergonomicsofassemblyworkfromajobdemandsresourcesperspectivethreequalitativecasestudies