Cargando…

Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study

The current study aimed to examine the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about suicidal ideation and the content and process of suicidal ideation. This was to examine the potential contribution of the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model (Wells and Matthew, 2015) to suicidal ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aadahl, Vikki, Wells, Adrian, Hallard, Robert, Pratt, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34886060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312336
_version_ 1784612306242502656
author Aadahl, Vikki
Wells, Adrian
Hallard, Robert
Pratt, Daniel
author_facet Aadahl, Vikki
Wells, Adrian
Hallard, Robert
Pratt, Daniel
author_sort Aadahl, Vikki
collection PubMed
description The current study aimed to examine the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about suicidal ideation and the content and process of suicidal ideation. This was to examine the potential contribution of the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model (Wells and Matthew, 2015) to suicidal ideation. Twenty-seven participants completed both trait and state-level measures of suicidal ideation, negative affect, defeat, hopelessness, entrapment and metacognitive beliefs. Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) was adopted to measure state-level measurements with participants invited to complete an online diary up to seven times a day for six days. Multi-level modelling enabled a detailed examination of the relationships between metacognitive beliefs and suicidal ideation. Positive (β = 0.241, p < 0.001) and negative (β = 0.167, p < 0.001) metacognitive beliefs about suicidal ideation were positively associated with concurrent suicidal ideation even when known cognitive correlates of suicide were controlled for. The results have important clinical implications for the assessment, formulation and treatment of suicidal ideation. Novel meta-cognitive treatments targeting beliefs about suicidal ideation are now indicated. A limited range of characteristics reported by participants affects the generalizability of findings. Future research is recommended to advance understanding of metacognition and suicide but results demonstrate an important contribution of the S-REF model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8656543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86565432021-12-10 Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study Aadahl, Vikki Wells, Adrian Hallard, Robert Pratt, Daniel Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The current study aimed to examine the relationship between metacognitive beliefs about suicidal ideation and the content and process of suicidal ideation. This was to examine the potential contribution of the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model (Wells and Matthew, 2015) to suicidal ideation. Twenty-seven participants completed both trait and state-level measures of suicidal ideation, negative affect, defeat, hopelessness, entrapment and metacognitive beliefs. Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) was adopted to measure state-level measurements with participants invited to complete an online diary up to seven times a day for six days. Multi-level modelling enabled a detailed examination of the relationships between metacognitive beliefs and suicidal ideation. Positive (β = 0.241, p < 0.001) and negative (β = 0.167, p < 0.001) metacognitive beliefs about suicidal ideation were positively associated with concurrent suicidal ideation even when known cognitive correlates of suicide were controlled for. The results have important clinical implications for the assessment, formulation and treatment of suicidal ideation. Novel meta-cognitive treatments targeting beliefs about suicidal ideation are now indicated. A limited range of characteristics reported by participants affects the generalizability of findings. Future research is recommended to advance understanding of metacognition and suicide but results demonstrate an important contribution of the S-REF model. MDPI 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8656543/ /pubmed/34886060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312336 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aadahl, Vikki
Wells, Adrian
Hallard, Robert
Pratt, Daniel
Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title_full Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title_fullStr Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title_full_unstemmed Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title_short Metacognitive Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation: An Experience Sampling Study
title_sort metacognitive beliefs and suicidal ideation: an experience sampling study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34886060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312336
work_keys_str_mv AT aadahlvikki metacognitivebeliefsandsuicidalideationanexperiencesamplingstudy
AT wellsadrian metacognitivebeliefsandsuicidalideationanexperiencesamplingstudy
AT hallardrobert metacognitivebeliefsandsuicidalideationanexperiencesamplingstudy
AT prattdaniel metacognitivebeliefsandsuicidalideationanexperiencesamplingstudy