Cargando…

Therapeutic effects of an oral gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor antagonist, relugolix, on preventing premature ovulation in mild ovarian stimulation for IVF

PURPOSE: Can relugolix, a novel oral gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor (GnRH) antagonist, function as an alternative ovulation inhibitor to GnRH antagonist injections? METHODS: This single‐center, cross‐sectional retrospective study compared premature ovulation rates and clinical outcomes in I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakao, Kazuki, Kuroda, Keiji, Horikawa, Takashi, Moriyama, Azusa, Juen, Hiroyasu, Itakura, Akiko, Watanabe, Hideaki, Takamizawa, Satoru, Ojiro, Yuko, Nakagawa, Koji, Sugiyama, Rikikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12422
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Can relugolix, a novel oral gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor (GnRH) antagonist, function as an alternative ovulation inhibitor to GnRH antagonist injections? METHODS: This single‐center, cross‐sectional retrospective study compared premature ovulation rates and clinical outcomes in IVF treatment after mild ovarian stimulation with 40 mg of relugolix (relugolix group) or 0.25‐mg injections of ganirelix acetate or cetrorelix acetate (injection group) between March 2019 and January 2020. Of 247 infertile women (256 IVF cycles) aged ≤42 years, 223 women (230 cycles) were evaluated. In the relugolix and injection groups, we compared 104 and 85 cycles after GnRH antagonist use before the LH surge (LH levels <10 mIU/ml) and 22 and 19 cycles during the LH surge (LH levels ≥10 mIU/ml), respectively. RESULTS: Before the LH surge, the ovulation rates in the two groups were very low (p = 0.838), however; during the LH surge, the cycles using relugolix had a high ovulation rate of 40.9% compared with no ovulation in the injection group (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in embryo culture findings and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although relugolix had a high ovulation suppressive effect, when the LH surge occurred, its effect was insufficient.