Cargando…
Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by predominant mucosal lesions and autoantibodies against laminin 332. The exact diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP is important since nearly 30% of patients develop solid cancers. This study compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.773720 |
_version_ | 1784612494790098944 |
---|---|
author | Goletz, Stephanie Giurdanella, Federica Holtsche, Maike M. Nijenhuis, Miranda Horvath, Barbara Diercks, Gilles F. H. Zillikens, Detlef Hashimoto, Takashi Schmidt, Enno Pas, Hendri H. |
author_facet | Goletz, Stephanie Giurdanella, Federica Holtsche, Maike M. Nijenhuis, Miranda Horvath, Barbara Diercks, Gilles F. H. Zillikens, Detlef Hashimoto, Takashi Schmidt, Enno Pas, Hendri H. |
author_sort | Goletz, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by predominant mucosal lesions and autoantibodies against laminin 332. The exact diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP is important since nearly 30% of patients develop solid cancers. This study compared two independently developed diagnostic indirect immunofluorescence (IF) tests based on recombinant laminin 332 expressed in HEK239 cells (biochip mosaic assay) and the migration trails of cultured keratinocytes rich in laminin 332 (footprint assay). The sera of 54 anti-laminin 332 MMP, 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP, and 30 pemphigus vulgaris patients as well as 20 healthy blood donors were analyzed blindly and independently. Fifty-two of 54 and 54/54 anti-laminin 332 MMP sera were positive in the biochip mosaic and the footprint assay, respectively. In the 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP sera, 3 were positive in both tests and 4 others showed weak reactivity in the footprint assay. In conclusion, both assays are easy to perform, highly sensitive, and specific, which will further facilitate the diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8657402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86574022021-12-10 Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Goletz, Stephanie Giurdanella, Federica Holtsche, Maike M. Nijenhuis, Miranda Horvath, Barbara Diercks, Gilles F. H. Zillikens, Detlef Hashimoto, Takashi Schmidt, Enno Pas, Hendri H. Front Immunol Immunology Anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by predominant mucosal lesions and autoantibodies against laminin 332. The exact diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP is important since nearly 30% of patients develop solid cancers. This study compared two independently developed diagnostic indirect immunofluorescence (IF) tests based on recombinant laminin 332 expressed in HEK239 cells (biochip mosaic assay) and the migration trails of cultured keratinocytes rich in laminin 332 (footprint assay). The sera of 54 anti-laminin 332 MMP, 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP, and 30 pemphigus vulgaris patients as well as 20 healthy blood donors were analyzed blindly and independently. Fifty-two of 54 and 54/54 anti-laminin 332 MMP sera were positive in the biochip mosaic and the footprint assay, respectively. In the 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP sera, 3 were positive in both tests and 4 others showed weak reactivity in the footprint assay. In conclusion, both assays are easy to perform, highly sensitive, and specific, which will further facilitate the diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8657402/ /pubmed/34899726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.773720 Text en Copyright © 2021 Goletz, Giurdanella, Holtsche, Nijenhuis, Horvath, Diercks, Zillikens, Hashimoto, Schmidt and Pas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Goletz, Stephanie Giurdanella, Federica Holtsche, Maike M. Nijenhuis, Miranda Horvath, Barbara Diercks, Gilles F. H. Zillikens, Detlef Hashimoto, Takashi Schmidt, Enno Pas, Hendri H. Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title | Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title_full | Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title_short | Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid |
title_sort | comparison of two diagnostic assays for anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.773720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goletzstephanie comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT giurdanellafederica comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT holtschemaikem comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT nijenhuismiranda comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT horvathbarbara comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT diercksgillesfh comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT zillikensdetlef comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT hashimototakashi comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT schmidtenno comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid AT pashendrih comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforantilaminin332mucousmembranepemphigoid |