Cargando…
Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations
As part of the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS), three immunization-stakeholder consultations were conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 to ensure that countries’ needs drove the prioritization of vaccine product innovations. All consultations targeted respondents with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34412922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.024 |
_version_ | 1784612584762114048 |
---|---|
author | Mvundura, Mercy Frivold, Collrane Janik Osborne, Anna Soni, Priyanka Robertson, Joanie Kumar, Sandeep Anena, Jacqueline Gueye, Abdoulaye Menozzi-Arnaud, Marion Giersing, Birgitte Kahn, Anna-Lea Scarna, Tiziana Kristensen, Debra |
author_facet | Mvundura, Mercy Frivold, Collrane Janik Osborne, Anna Soni, Priyanka Robertson, Joanie Kumar, Sandeep Anena, Jacqueline Gueye, Abdoulaye Menozzi-Arnaud, Marion Giersing, Birgitte Kahn, Anna-Lea Scarna, Tiziana Kristensen, Debra |
author_sort | Mvundura, Mercy |
collection | PubMed |
description | As part of the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS), three immunization-stakeholder consultations were conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 to ensure that countries’ needs drove the prioritization of vaccine product innovations. All consultations targeted respondents with immunization program experience. They included: (1) an online survey to identify immunization implementation barriers and desired vaccine attributes in three use settings, (2) an online survey to identify and evaluate the most important immunization challenges for ten exemplar vaccines, and (3) in-depth interviews to better understand the perceived programmatic benefits and challenges that could be addressed by nine innovations and to rank the innovations that could best address current challenges. The first consultation included responses from 442 participants in 61 countries, representing 89% of the 496 respondents who correctly completed at least one section of the online survey. For facility-based settings, missed opportunities for vaccination due to reluctance to open multidose vaccine vials was the barrier most frequently selected by respondents. In community-based (outreach) and campaign settings, limited access to immunization services due to geographic barriers was most frequently selected. Multidose presentations with preservative or single-dose presentations were most frequently selected as desired vaccine attributes for facility-based settings while improved thermostability was most frequently selected for outreach and campaign settings. The second online survey was completed by 220 respondents in 54 countries. For the exemplar vaccines, vaccine ineffectiveness or wastage due to heat or freeze exposure and missed opportunities due to multidose vial presentations were identified as the greatest vaccine-specific challenges. In-depth interviews with 84 respondents in six countries ranked microarray patches, dual-chamber delivery devices, and heat-stable/controlled temperature chain qualified liquid vaccines as the three innovations that could have the greatest impact in helping address current immunization program challenges. These findings informed the VIPS prioritization and provided broader application to designing immunization interventions to better meet country needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8657797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86577972021-12-21 Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations Mvundura, Mercy Frivold, Collrane Janik Osborne, Anna Soni, Priyanka Robertson, Joanie Kumar, Sandeep Anena, Jacqueline Gueye, Abdoulaye Menozzi-Arnaud, Marion Giersing, Birgitte Kahn, Anna-Lea Scarna, Tiziana Kristensen, Debra Vaccine Article As part of the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS), three immunization-stakeholder consultations were conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 to ensure that countries’ needs drove the prioritization of vaccine product innovations. All consultations targeted respondents with immunization program experience. They included: (1) an online survey to identify immunization implementation barriers and desired vaccine attributes in three use settings, (2) an online survey to identify and evaluate the most important immunization challenges for ten exemplar vaccines, and (3) in-depth interviews to better understand the perceived programmatic benefits and challenges that could be addressed by nine innovations and to rank the innovations that could best address current challenges. The first consultation included responses from 442 participants in 61 countries, representing 89% of the 496 respondents who correctly completed at least one section of the online survey. For facility-based settings, missed opportunities for vaccination due to reluctance to open multidose vaccine vials was the barrier most frequently selected by respondents. In community-based (outreach) and campaign settings, limited access to immunization services due to geographic barriers was most frequently selected. Multidose presentations with preservative or single-dose presentations were most frequently selected as desired vaccine attributes for facility-based settings while improved thermostability was most frequently selected for outreach and campaign settings. The second online survey was completed by 220 respondents in 54 countries. For the exemplar vaccines, vaccine ineffectiveness or wastage due to heat or freeze exposure and missed opportunities due to multidose vial presentations were identified as the greatest vaccine-specific challenges. In-depth interviews with 84 respondents in six countries ranked microarray patches, dual-chamber delivery devices, and heat-stable/controlled temperature chain qualified liquid vaccines as the three innovations that could have the greatest impact in helping address current immunization program challenges. These findings informed the VIPS prioritization and provided broader application to designing immunization interventions to better meet country needs. Elsevier Science 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8657797/ /pubmed/34412922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.024 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mvundura, Mercy Frivold, Collrane Janik Osborne, Anna Soni, Priyanka Robertson, Joanie Kumar, Sandeep Anena, Jacqueline Gueye, Abdoulaye Menozzi-Arnaud, Marion Giersing, Birgitte Kahn, Anna-Lea Scarna, Tiziana Kristensen, Debra Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title | Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title_full | Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title_fullStr | Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title_short | Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
title_sort | vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34412922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mvunduramercy vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT frivoldcollrane vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT janikosborneanna vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT sonipriyanka vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT robertsonjoanie vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT kumarsandeep vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT anenajacqueline vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT gueyeabdoulaye vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT menozziarnaudmarion vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT giersingbirgitte vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT kahnannalea vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT scarnatiziana vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations AT kristensendebra vaccineinnovationprioritisationstrategyfindingsfromthreecountrystakeholderconsultationsonvaccineproductinnovations |