Cargando…

Visible Light Trapping against Charge Recombination in FeO(x)–TiO(2) Photonic Crystal Photocatalysts

Tailoring metal oxide photocatalysts in the form of heterostructured photonic crystals has spurred particular interest as an advanced route to simultaneously improve harnessing of solar light and charge separation relying on the combined effect of light trapping by macroporous periodic structures an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pylarinou, Martha, Toumazatou, Alexia, Sakellis, Elias, Xenogiannopoulou, Evangelia, Gardelis, Spiros, Boukos, Nikos, Dimoulas, Athanasios, Likodimos, Vlassis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885271
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237117
Descripción
Sumario:Tailoring metal oxide photocatalysts in the form of heterostructured photonic crystals has spurred particular interest as an advanced route to simultaneously improve harnessing of solar light and charge separation relying on the combined effect of light trapping by macroporous periodic structures and compositional materials’ modifications. In this work, surface deposition of FeO(x) nanoclusters on TiO(2) photonic crystals is investigated to explore the interplay of slow-photon amplification, visible light absorption, and charge separation in FeO(x)–TiO(2) photocatalytic films. Photonic bandgap engineered TiO(2) inverse opals deposited by the convective evaporation-induced co-assembly method were surface modified by successive chemisorption-calcination cycles using Fe(III) acetylacetonate, which allowed the controlled variation of FeO(x) loading on the photonic films. Low amounts of FeO(x) nanoclusters on the TiO(2) inverse opals resulted in diameter-selective improvements of photocatalytic performance on salicylic acid degradation and photocurrent density under visible light, surpassing similarly modified P25 films. The observed enhancement was related to the combination of optimal light trapping and charge separation induced by the FeO(x)–TiO(2) interfacial coupling. However, an increase of the FeO(x) loading resulted in severe performance deterioration, particularly prominent under UV-Vis light, attributed to persistent surface recombination via diverse defect d-states.