Cargando…

A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints

Process planning optimization is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial problem extensively studied in the scientific community. Its main components include operation sequencing, selection of manufacturing resources and determination of appropriate setup plans. These problems require metaheuristic-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milosevic, Mijodrag, Cep, Robert, Cepova, Lenka, Lukic, Dejan, Antic, Aco, Djurdjev, Mica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237360
_version_ 1784612668148023296
author Milosevic, Mijodrag
Cep, Robert
Cepova, Lenka
Lukic, Dejan
Antic, Aco
Djurdjev, Mica
author_facet Milosevic, Mijodrag
Cep, Robert
Cepova, Lenka
Lukic, Dejan
Antic, Aco
Djurdjev, Mica
author_sort Milosevic, Mijodrag
collection PubMed
description Process planning optimization is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial problem extensively studied in the scientific community. Its main components include operation sequencing, selection of manufacturing resources and determination of appropriate setup plans. These problems require metaheuristic-based approaches in order to be effectively and efficiently solved. Therefore, to optimize the complex process planning problem, a novel hybrid grey wolf optimizer (HGWO) is proposed. The traditional grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is improved by employing genetic strategies such as selection, crossover and mutation which enhance global search abilities and convergence of the traditional GWO. Precedence relationships among machining operations are taken into account and precedence constraints are modeled using operation precedence graphs and adjacency matrices. Constraint handling heuristic procedure is adopted to move infeasible solutions to a feasible domain. Minimization of the total weighted machining cost of a process plan is adopted as the objective and three experimental studies that consider three different prismatic parts are conducted. Comparative analysis of the obtained cost values, as well as the convergence analysis, are performed and the HGWO approach demonstrated effectiveness and flexibility in finding optimal and near-optimal process plans. On the other side, comparative analysis of computational times and execution times of certain MATLAB functions showed that the HGWO have good time efficiency but limited since it requires more time compared to considered hybrid and traditional algorithms. Potential directions to improving efficiency and performances of the proposed approach are given in conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8658175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86581752021-12-10 A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints Milosevic, Mijodrag Cep, Robert Cepova, Lenka Lukic, Dejan Antic, Aco Djurdjev, Mica Materials (Basel) Article Process planning optimization is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial problem extensively studied in the scientific community. Its main components include operation sequencing, selection of manufacturing resources and determination of appropriate setup plans. These problems require metaheuristic-based approaches in order to be effectively and efficiently solved. Therefore, to optimize the complex process planning problem, a novel hybrid grey wolf optimizer (HGWO) is proposed. The traditional grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is improved by employing genetic strategies such as selection, crossover and mutation which enhance global search abilities and convergence of the traditional GWO. Precedence relationships among machining operations are taken into account and precedence constraints are modeled using operation precedence graphs and adjacency matrices. Constraint handling heuristic procedure is adopted to move infeasible solutions to a feasible domain. Minimization of the total weighted machining cost of a process plan is adopted as the objective and three experimental studies that consider three different prismatic parts are conducted. Comparative analysis of the obtained cost values, as well as the convergence analysis, are performed and the HGWO approach demonstrated effectiveness and flexibility in finding optimal and near-optimal process plans. On the other side, comparative analysis of computational times and execution times of certain MATLAB functions showed that the HGWO have good time efficiency but limited since it requires more time compared to considered hybrid and traditional algorithms. Potential directions to improving efficiency and performances of the proposed approach are given in conclusions. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8658175/ /pubmed/34885512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237360 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Milosevic, Mijodrag
Cep, Robert
Cepova, Lenka
Lukic, Dejan
Antic, Aco
Djurdjev, Mica
A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title_full A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title_fullStr A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title_full_unstemmed A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title_short A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer for Process Planning Optimization with Precedence Constraints
title_sort hybrid grey wolf optimizer for process planning optimization with precedence constraints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237360
work_keys_str_mv AT milosevicmijodrag ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT ceprobert ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT cepovalenka ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT lukicdejan ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT anticaco ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT djurdjevmica ahybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT milosevicmijodrag hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT ceprobert hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT cepovalenka hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT lukicdejan hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT anticaco hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints
AT djurdjevmica hybridgreywolfoptimizerforprocessplanningoptimizationwithprecedenceconstraints