Cargando…
One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 7...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604 |
_version_ | 1784612683447795712 |
---|---|
author | Guevara, Nicolas Parietti-Winkler, Cécile Godey, Benoit Franco-Vidal, Valerie Gnansia, Dan Ardoint, Marine Hoen, Michel Karoui, Chadlia Truy, Eric Vincent, Christophe Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann |
author_facet | Guevara, Nicolas Parietti-Winkler, Cécile Godey, Benoit Franco-Vidal, Valerie Gnansia, Dan Ardoint, Marine Hoen, Michel Karoui, Chadlia Truy, Eric Vincent, Christophe Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann |
author_sort | Guevara, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 750 Hz) were implanted with the EVO™ electrode array. Hearing thresholds were collected at five time-points from CI activation to twelve months (12M) after activation. Hearing thresholds and hearing preservation profiles (HEARRING group classification) were assessed. Results: All subjects had measurable hearing thresholds at follow-up. No case of complete loss of hearing or minimal hearing preservation was reported at any time point. At activation (N(act) = 15), five participants had complete hearing preservation, and ten participants had partial hearing preservation. At the 12M time point (N(12m) = 6), three participants had complete hearing preservation, and three participants had partial hearing preservation. Mean hearing loss at activation was 11 dB for full range PTA and 25 dB for PTAs low-frequency (125–500 Hz). Conclusions: This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up on associated hearing profiles to the EVO™ electrode array, which are comparable to the literature. However, other studies on larger populations should be performed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8658238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86582382021-12-10 One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array Guevara, Nicolas Parietti-Winkler, Cécile Godey, Benoit Franco-Vidal, Valerie Gnansia, Dan Ardoint, Marine Hoen, Michel Karoui, Chadlia Truy, Eric Vincent, Christophe Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann J Clin Med Article Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 750 Hz) were implanted with the EVO™ electrode array. Hearing thresholds were collected at five time-points from CI activation to twelve months (12M) after activation. Hearing thresholds and hearing preservation profiles (HEARRING group classification) were assessed. Results: All subjects had measurable hearing thresholds at follow-up. No case of complete loss of hearing or minimal hearing preservation was reported at any time point. At activation (N(act) = 15), five participants had complete hearing preservation, and ten participants had partial hearing preservation. At the 12M time point (N(12m) = 6), three participants had complete hearing preservation, and three participants had partial hearing preservation. Mean hearing loss at activation was 11 dB for full range PTA and 25 dB for PTAs low-frequency (125–500 Hz). Conclusions: This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up on associated hearing profiles to the EVO™ electrode array, which are comparable to the literature. However, other studies on larger populations should be performed. MDPI 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8658238/ /pubmed/34884306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guevara, Nicolas Parietti-Winkler, Cécile Godey, Benoit Franco-Vidal, Valerie Gnansia, Dan Ardoint, Marine Hoen, Michel Karoui, Chadlia Truy, Eric Vincent, Christophe Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title | One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title_full | One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title_fullStr | One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title_full_unstemmed | One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title_short | One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array |
title_sort | one year assessment of the hearing preservation potential of the evo electrode array |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guevaranicolas oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT pariettiwinklercecile oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT godeybenoit oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT francovidalvalerie oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT gnansiadan oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT ardointmarine oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT hoenmichel oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT karouichadlia oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT truyeric oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT vincentchristophe oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT mosnierisabelle oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray AT nguyenyann oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray |