Cargando…

One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array

Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guevara, Nicolas, Parietti-Winkler, Cécile, Godey, Benoit, Franco-Vidal, Valerie, Gnansia, Dan, Ardoint, Marine, Hoen, Michel, Karoui, Chadlia, Truy, Eric, Vincent, Christophe, Mosnier, Isabelle, Nguyen, Yann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604
_version_ 1784612683447795712
author Guevara, Nicolas
Parietti-Winkler, Cécile
Godey, Benoit
Franco-Vidal, Valerie
Gnansia, Dan
Ardoint, Marine
Hoen, Michel
Karoui, Chadlia
Truy, Eric
Vincent, Christophe
Mosnier, Isabelle
Nguyen, Yann
author_facet Guevara, Nicolas
Parietti-Winkler, Cécile
Godey, Benoit
Franco-Vidal, Valerie
Gnansia, Dan
Ardoint, Marine
Hoen, Michel
Karoui, Chadlia
Truy, Eric
Vincent, Christophe
Mosnier, Isabelle
Nguyen, Yann
author_sort Guevara, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 750 Hz) were implanted with the EVO™ electrode array. Hearing thresholds were collected at five time-points from CI activation to twelve months (12M) after activation. Hearing thresholds and hearing preservation profiles (HEARRING group classification) were assessed. Results: All subjects had measurable hearing thresholds at follow-up. No case of complete loss of hearing or minimal hearing preservation was reported at any time point. At activation (N(act) = 15), five participants had complete hearing preservation, and ten participants had partial hearing preservation. At the 12M time point (N(12m) = 6), three participants had complete hearing preservation, and three participants had partial hearing preservation. Mean hearing loss at activation was 11 dB for full range PTA and 25 dB for PTAs low-frequency (125–500 Hz). Conclusions: This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up on associated hearing profiles to the EVO™ electrode array, which are comparable to the literature. However, other studies on larger populations should be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8658238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86582382021-12-10 One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array Guevara, Nicolas Parietti-Winkler, Cécile Godey, Benoit Franco-Vidal, Valerie Gnansia, Dan Ardoint, Marine Hoen, Michel Karoui, Chadlia Truy, Eric Vincent, Christophe Mosnier, Isabelle Nguyen, Yann J Clin Med Article Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVO(TM) electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 750 Hz) were implanted with the EVO™ electrode array. Hearing thresholds were collected at five time-points from CI activation to twelve months (12M) after activation. Hearing thresholds and hearing preservation profiles (HEARRING group classification) were assessed. Results: All subjects had measurable hearing thresholds at follow-up. No case of complete loss of hearing or minimal hearing preservation was reported at any time point. At activation (N(act) = 15), five participants had complete hearing preservation, and ten participants had partial hearing preservation. At the 12M time point (N(12m) = 6), three participants had complete hearing preservation, and three participants had partial hearing preservation. Mean hearing loss at activation was 11 dB for full range PTA and 25 dB for PTAs low-frequency (125–500 Hz). Conclusions: This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up on associated hearing profiles to the EVO™ electrode array, which are comparable to the literature. However, other studies on larger populations should be performed. MDPI 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8658238/ /pubmed/34884306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guevara, Nicolas
Parietti-Winkler, Cécile
Godey, Benoit
Franco-Vidal, Valerie
Gnansia, Dan
Ardoint, Marine
Hoen, Michel
Karoui, Chadlia
Truy, Eric
Vincent, Christophe
Mosnier, Isabelle
Nguyen, Yann
One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title_full One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title_fullStr One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title_full_unstemmed One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title_short One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array
title_sort one year assessment of the hearing preservation potential of the evo electrode array
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235604
work_keys_str_mv AT guevaranicolas oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT pariettiwinklercecile oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT godeybenoit oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT francovidalvalerie oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT gnansiadan oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT ardointmarine oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT hoenmichel oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT karouichadlia oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT truyeric oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT vincentchristophe oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT mosnierisabelle oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray
AT nguyenyann oneyearassessmentofthehearingpreservationpotentialoftheevoelectrodearray