Cargando…

Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations

It is essential to make openings in structural concrete elements to accommodate mechanical and electrical needs. To study the effect of these openings on the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) elements, a numerical investigation was performed and validated using previous experimental work. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharaky, Ibrahim A., Elamary, Ahmed S., Alharthi, Yasir M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237203
_version_ 1784612743972651008
author Sharaky, Ibrahim A.
Elamary, Ahmed S.
Alharthi, Yasir M.
author_facet Sharaky, Ibrahim A.
Elamary, Ahmed S.
Alharthi, Yasir M.
author_sort Sharaky, Ibrahim A.
collection PubMed
description It is essential to make openings in structural concrete elements to accommodate mechanical and electrical needs. To study the effect of these openings on the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) elements, a numerical investigation was performed and validated using previous experimental work. The effect of the position and dimension of the opening and the beam length on the response of the beams, loads capacities, and failure modes was studied. The simulated RC beams showed different responses, loads capacities, and failure modes depending on the position and dimension of the opening. The transversal near support opening (TNSH) and longitudinal holes (LH) showed lower effects on the load capacities of the beams than the transversal near center opening (TNCH). The supreme reduction percentages of the load capacity (µ(u)%) for beams with TNCH and TNSH were 37.21% and 30.34%, respectively (opening size = 150 × 150 mm(2)). In addition, the maximum µ(u)% for beam with LH was 17.82% (opening size = 25% of the beam size). The TNSH with a width of less than 18.18% of the beam shear span (550 mm) had trivial effects on the beam’s load capacities (the maximum µ(u)% = 1.26%). Although the beams with combined LH and TNCH or LH and TNSH showed different failure modes, they experienced nearly the same load reductions. Moreover, the length of the beam (solid or hollow) had a great effect on its failure mode and load capacity. Finally, equations were proposed and validated to calculate the yield load and post-cracking deflection for the concrete beams with a longitudinal opening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8658486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86584862021-12-10 Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations Sharaky, Ibrahim A. Elamary, Ahmed S. Alharthi, Yasir M. Materials (Basel) Article It is essential to make openings in structural concrete elements to accommodate mechanical and electrical needs. To study the effect of these openings on the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) elements, a numerical investigation was performed and validated using previous experimental work. The effect of the position and dimension of the opening and the beam length on the response of the beams, loads capacities, and failure modes was studied. The simulated RC beams showed different responses, loads capacities, and failure modes depending on the position and dimension of the opening. The transversal near support opening (TNSH) and longitudinal holes (LH) showed lower effects on the load capacities of the beams than the transversal near center opening (TNCH). The supreme reduction percentages of the load capacity (µ(u)%) for beams with TNCH and TNSH were 37.21% and 30.34%, respectively (opening size = 150 × 150 mm(2)). In addition, the maximum µ(u)% for beam with LH was 17.82% (opening size = 25% of the beam size). The TNSH with a width of less than 18.18% of the beam shear span (550 mm) had trivial effects on the beam’s load capacities (the maximum µ(u)% = 1.26%). Although the beams with combined LH and TNCH or LH and TNSH showed different failure modes, they experienced nearly the same load reductions. Moreover, the length of the beam (solid or hollow) had a great effect on its failure mode and load capacity. Finally, equations were proposed and validated to calculate the yield load and post-cracking deflection for the concrete beams with a longitudinal opening. MDPI 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8658486/ /pubmed/34885356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237203 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sharaky, Ibrahim A.
Elamary, Ahmed S.
Alharthi, Yasir M.
Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title_full Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title_fullStr Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title_full_unstemmed Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title_short Flexural Response and Failure Analysis of Solid and Hollow Core Concrete Beams with Additional Opening at Different Locations
title_sort flexural response and failure analysis of solid and hollow core concrete beams with additional opening at different locations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237203
work_keys_str_mv AT sharakyibrahima flexuralresponseandfailureanalysisofsolidandhollowcoreconcretebeamswithadditionalopeningatdifferentlocations
AT elamaryahmeds flexuralresponseandfailureanalysisofsolidandhollowcoreconcretebeamswithadditionalopeningatdifferentlocations
AT alharthiyasirm flexuralresponseandfailureanalysisofsolidandhollowcoreconcretebeamswithadditionalopeningatdifferentlocations