Cargando…

Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys

Reaching simultaneously high mechanical strength and low electrical resistivity is difficult as both properties are based on similar microstructural mechanisms. In our previous work, a new parameter, the tensile strength-over-electrical resistivity ratio, is proposed to evaluate the matching of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hongming, Zhang, Shuang, Zhao, Yajun, Li, Xiaona, Jiang, Fushi, Dong, Chuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237150
_version_ 1784612789188296704
author Li, Hongming
Zhang, Shuang
Zhao, Yajun
Li, Xiaona
Jiang, Fushi
Dong, Chuang
author_facet Li, Hongming
Zhang, Shuang
Zhao, Yajun
Li, Xiaona
Jiang, Fushi
Dong, Chuang
author_sort Li, Hongming
collection PubMed
description Reaching simultaneously high mechanical strength and low electrical resistivity is difficult as both properties are based on similar microstructural mechanisms. In our previous work, a new parameter, the tensile strength-over-electrical resistivity ratio, is proposed to evaluate the matching of the two properties in Cu alloys. A specific ratio of 310 × 10(8) MPa·Ω(−1)·m(−1), independent of the alloy system and thermal history, is obtained from Cu-Ni-Mo alloys, which actually points to the lower limit of prevailing Cu alloys possessing high strength and low resistivity. The present paper explores the origin of this specific ratio by introducing the dual-phase mechanical model of composite materials, assuming that the precipitate particles are mechanically mixed in the Cu solid solution matrix. The strength and resistivity of an alloy are respectively in series and parallel connections to those of the matrix and the precipitate. After ideally matching the contributions from the matrix and the precipitate, the alloy should at least reach half of the resistivity of pure Cu, i.e., 50%IACS, which is the lower limit for industrially accepted highly conductive Cu alloys. Under this condition, the specific 310 ratio is related to the precipitate-over-matrix ratios for strength and resistivity, which are both two times those of pure Cu.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8658687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86586872021-12-10 Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys Li, Hongming Zhang, Shuang Zhao, Yajun Li, Xiaona Jiang, Fushi Dong, Chuang Materials (Basel) Article Reaching simultaneously high mechanical strength and low electrical resistivity is difficult as both properties are based on similar microstructural mechanisms. In our previous work, a new parameter, the tensile strength-over-electrical resistivity ratio, is proposed to evaluate the matching of the two properties in Cu alloys. A specific ratio of 310 × 10(8) MPa·Ω(−1)·m(−1), independent of the alloy system and thermal history, is obtained from Cu-Ni-Mo alloys, which actually points to the lower limit of prevailing Cu alloys possessing high strength and low resistivity. The present paper explores the origin of this specific ratio by introducing the dual-phase mechanical model of composite materials, assuming that the precipitate particles are mechanically mixed in the Cu solid solution matrix. The strength and resistivity of an alloy are respectively in series and parallel connections to those of the matrix and the precipitate. After ideally matching the contributions from the matrix and the precipitate, the alloy should at least reach half of the resistivity of pure Cu, i.e., 50%IACS, which is the lower limit for industrially accepted highly conductive Cu alloys. Under this condition, the specific 310 ratio is related to the precipitate-over-matrix ratios for strength and resistivity, which are both two times those of pure Cu. MDPI 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8658687/ /pubmed/34885304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237150 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Hongming
Zhang, Shuang
Zhao, Yajun
Li, Xiaona
Jiang, Fushi
Dong, Chuang
Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title_full Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title_fullStr Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title_short Interpretation of Specific Strength-Over-Resistivity Ratio in Cu Alloys
title_sort interpretation of specific strength-over-resistivity ratio in cu alloys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14237150
work_keys_str_mv AT lihongming interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys
AT zhangshuang interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys
AT zhaoyajun interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys
AT lixiaona interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys
AT jiangfushi interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys
AT dongchuang interpretationofspecificstrengthoverresistivityratioincualloys