Cargando…
Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques
This study aimed to compare the surface roughness, hardness, and flexure strength of interim indirect resin restorations fabricated with CAD-CAM (CC), 3D printing (3D), and conventional techniques (CV). Twenty disk (3 mm × Ø10 mm) and ten bar specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated for the CC, 3D,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34883581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13234077 |
_version_ | 1784612852320960512 |
---|---|
author | Al-Qahtani, Amal S. Tulbah, Huda I. Binhasan, Mashael Abbasi, Maria S. Ahmed, Naseer Shabib, Sara Farooq, Imran Aldahian, Nada Nisar, Sidra S. Tanveer, Syeda A. Vohra, Fahim Abduljabbar, Tariq |
author_facet | Al-Qahtani, Amal S. Tulbah, Huda I. Binhasan, Mashael Abbasi, Maria S. Ahmed, Naseer Shabib, Sara Farooq, Imran Aldahian, Nada Nisar, Sidra S. Tanveer, Syeda A. Vohra, Fahim Abduljabbar, Tariq |
author_sort | Al-Qahtani, Amal S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the surface roughness, hardness, and flexure strength of interim indirect resin restorations fabricated with CAD-CAM (CC), 3D printing (3D), and conventional techniques (CV). Twenty disk (3 mm × Ø10 mm) and ten bar specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated for the CC, 3D, and CV groups, to be used for surface roughness, micro-hardness, and flexural strength testing using standardized protocol. Three indentations for Vickers micro-hardness (VHN) were performed on each disk and an average was identified for each specimen. Surface micro-roughness (Ra) was calculated in micrometers (μm) using a 3D optical non-contact surface microscope. A three-point bending test with a universal testing machine was utilized for assessing flexural strength. The load was applied at a crosshead speed of 3 mm/min over a distance of 25 mm until fracture. Means and standard deviations were compared using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey–Kramer tests, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ra was significantly different among the study groups (p < 0.05). Surface roughness among the CC and CV groups was statistically comparable (p > 0.05). However, 3D showed significantly higher Ra compared to CC and CV samples (p < 0.05). Micro-hardness was significantly higher in 3D samples (p < 0.05) compared to CC and CV specimens. In addition, CC and CV showed comparable micro-hardness (p > 0.05). A significant difference in flexural strength was observed among the study groups (p < 0.05). CC and 3D showed comparable strength outcomes (p > 0.05), although CV specimens showed significantly lower (p < 0.05) strength compared to CC and 3D samples. The 3D-printed provisional restorative resins showed flexural strength and micro-hardness comparable to CAD-CAM fabricated specimens, and surface micro-roughness for printed specimens was considerably higher compared to CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8658960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86589602021-12-10 Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques Al-Qahtani, Amal S. Tulbah, Huda I. Binhasan, Mashael Abbasi, Maria S. Ahmed, Naseer Shabib, Sara Farooq, Imran Aldahian, Nada Nisar, Sidra S. Tanveer, Syeda A. Vohra, Fahim Abduljabbar, Tariq Polymers (Basel) Article This study aimed to compare the surface roughness, hardness, and flexure strength of interim indirect resin restorations fabricated with CAD-CAM (CC), 3D printing (3D), and conventional techniques (CV). Twenty disk (3 mm × Ø10 mm) and ten bar specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated for the CC, 3D, and CV groups, to be used for surface roughness, micro-hardness, and flexural strength testing using standardized protocol. Three indentations for Vickers micro-hardness (VHN) were performed on each disk and an average was identified for each specimen. Surface micro-roughness (Ra) was calculated in micrometers (μm) using a 3D optical non-contact surface microscope. A three-point bending test with a universal testing machine was utilized for assessing flexural strength. The load was applied at a crosshead speed of 3 mm/min over a distance of 25 mm until fracture. Means and standard deviations were compared using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey–Kramer tests, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ra was significantly different among the study groups (p < 0.05). Surface roughness among the CC and CV groups was statistically comparable (p > 0.05). However, 3D showed significantly higher Ra compared to CC and CV samples (p < 0.05). Micro-hardness was significantly higher in 3D samples (p < 0.05) compared to CC and CV specimens. In addition, CC and CV showed comparable micro-hardness (p > 0.05). A significant difference in flexural strength was observed among the study groups (p < 0.05). CC and 3D showed comparable strength outcomes (p > 0.05), although CV specimens showed significantly lower (p < 0.05) strength compared to CC and 3D samples. The 3D-printed provisional restorative resins showed flexural strength and micro-hardness comparable to CAD-CAM fabricated specimens, and surface micro-roughness for printed specimens was considerably higher compared to CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. MDPI 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8658960/ /pubmed/34883581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13234077 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Qahtani, Amal S. Tulbah, Huda I. Binhasan, Mashael Abbasi, Maria S. Ahmed, Naseer Shabib, Sara Farooq, Imran Aldahian, Nada Nisar, Sidra S. Tanveer, Syeda A. Vohra, Fahim Abduljabbar, Tariq Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title | Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title_full | Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title_fullStr | Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title_short | Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques |
title_sort | surface properties of polymer resins fabricated with subtractive and additive manufacturing techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34883581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13234077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alqahtaniamals surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT tulbahhudai surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT binhasanmashael surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT abbasimarias surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT ahmednaseer surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT shabibsara surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT farooqimran surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT aldahiannada surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT nisarsidras surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT tanveersyedaa surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT vohrafahim surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques AT abduljabbartariq surfacepropertiesofpolymerresinsfabricatedwithsubtractiveandadditivemanufacturingtechniques |