Cargando…
Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk
BACKGROUND: Large numbers of chemicals require evaluation to determine if their production and use pose potential risks to ecological and human health. For most chemicals, the inadequacy and uncertainty of chemical-specific data severely limit the application of exposure- and risk-based methods for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Environmental Health Perspectives
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP9372 |
_version_ | 1784612857546014720 |
---|---|
author | Li, Li Sangion, Alessandro Wania, Frank Armitage, James M. Toose, Liisa Hughes, Lauren Arnot, Jon A. |
author_facet | Li, Li Sangion, Alessandro Wania, Frank Armitage, James M. Toose, Liisa Hughes, Lauren Arnot, Jon A. |
author_sort | Li, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Large numbers of chemicals require evaluation to determine if their production and use pose potential risks to ecological and human health. For most chemicals, the inadequacy and uncertainty of chemical-specific data severely limit the application of exposure- and risk-based methods for screening-level assessments, priority setting, and effective management. OBJECTIVE: We developed and evaluated a holistic, mechanistic modeling framework for ecological and human health assessments to support the safe and sustainable production, use, and disposal of organic chemicals. METHODS: We consolidated various models for simulating the PROduction-To-EXposure (PROTEX) continuum with empirical data sets and models for predicting chemical property and use function information to enable high-throughput (HT) exposure and risk estimation. The new PROTEX-HT framework calculates exposure and risk by integrating mechanistic computational modules describing chemical behavior and fate in the socioeconomic system (i.e., life cycle emissions), natural and indoor environments, various ecological receptors, and humans. PROTEX-HT requires only molecular structure and chemical tonnage (i.e., annual production or consumption volume) as input information. We evaluated the PROTEX-HT framework using 95 organic chemicals commercialized in the United States and demonstrated its application in various exposure and risk assessment contexts. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent and 97% of the PROTEX-HT human exposure predictions were within one and two orders of magnitude, respectively, of independent human exposure estimates inferred from biomonitoring data. PROTEX-HT supported screening and ranking chemicals based on various exposure and risk metrics, setting chemical-specific maximum allowable tonnage based on user-defined toxicological thresholds, and identifying the most relevant emission sources, environmental media, and exposure routes of concern in the PROTEX continuum. The case study shows that high chemical tonnage did not necessarily result in high exposure or health risks. CONCLUSION: Requiring only two chemical-specific pieces of information, PROTEX-HT enables efficient screening-level evaluations of existing and premanufacture chemicals in various exposure- and risk-based contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9372 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8658982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Environmental Health Perspectives |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86589822021-12-13 Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk Li, Li Sangion, Alessandro Wania, Frank Armitage, James M. Toose, Liisa Hughes, Lauren Arnot, Jon A. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Large numbers of chemicals require evaluation to determine if their production and use pose potential risks to ecological and human health. For most chemicals, the inadequacy and uncertainty of chemical-specific data severely limit the application of exposure- and risk-based methods for screening-level assessments, priority setting, and effective management. OBJECTIVE: We developed and evaluated a holistic, mechanistic modeling framework for ecological and human health assessments to support the safe and sustainable production, use, and disposal of organic chemicals. METHODS: We consolidated various models for simulating the PROduction-To-EXposure (PROTEX) continuum with empirical data sets and models for predicting chemical property and use function information to enable high-throughput (HT) exposure and risk estimation. The new PROTEX-HT framework calculates exposure and risk by integrating mechanistic computational modules describing chemical behavior and fate in the socioeconomic system (i.e., life cycle emissions), natural and indoor environments, various ecological receptors, and humans. PROTEX-HT requires only molecular structure and chemical tonnage (i.e., annual production or consumption volume) as input information. We evaluated the PROTEX-HT framework using 95 organic chemicals commercialized in the United States and demonstrated its application in various exposure and risk assessment contexts. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent and 97% of the PROTEX-HT human exposure predictions were within one and two orders of magnitude, respectively, of independent human exposure estimates inferred from biomonitoring data. PROTEX-HT supported screening and ranking chemicals based on various exposure and risk metrics, setting chemical-specific maximum allowable tonnage based on user-defined toxicological thresholds, and identifying the most relevant emission sources, environmental media, and exposure routes of concern in the PROTEX continuum. The case study shows that high chemical tonnage did not necessarily result in high exposure or health risks. CONCLUSION: Requiring only two chemical-specific pieces of information, PROTEX-HT enables efficient screening-level evaluations of existing and premanufacture chemicals in various exposure- and risk-based contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9372 Environmental Health Perspectives 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8658982/ /pubmed/34882502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP9372 Text en https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/about-ehp/licenseEHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Li Sangion, Alessandro Wania, Frank Armitage, James M. Toose, Liisa Hughes, Lauren Arnot, Jon A. Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title | Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title_full | Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title_fullStr | Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title_short | Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a holistic and mechanistic modeling framework for chemical emissions, fate, exposure, and risk |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP9372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lili developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT sangionalessandro developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT waniafrank developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT armitagejamesm developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT tooseliisa developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT hugheslauren developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk AT arnotjona developmentandevaluationofaholisticandmechanisticmodelingframeworkforchemicalemissionsfateexposureandrisk |