Cargando…
Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review
In 1896, a serendipitous laboratory accident led to the understanding that hookworms propagate infection by penetrating skin, a theory that was then confirmed with the first experimental human infection, reported in 1901. Experimental human infections undertaken in the 20th century enabled understan...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009908 |
_version_ | 1784612938396467200 |
---|---|
author | Chapman, Paul R. Giacomin, Paul Loukas, Alex McCarthy, James S. |
author_facet | Chapman, Paul R. Giacomin, Paul Loukas, Alex McCarthy, James S. |
author_sort | Chapman, Paul R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 1896, a serendipitous laboratory accident led to the understanding that hookworms propagate infection by penetrating skin, a theory that was then confirmed with the first experimental human infection, reported in 1901. Experimental human infections undertaken in the 20th century enabled understanding of the natural history of infection and the immune response. More recently, experimental hookworm infection has been performed to investigate the immunomodulatory potential of hookworm infection and for the evaluation of hookworm vaccines and chemotherapeutic interventions. Experimental human hookworm infection has been proven to be safe, with no deaths observed in over 500 participants (although early reports predate systematic adverse event reporting) and no serious adverse events described in over 200 participants enrolled in contemporary clinical trials. While experimental human hookworm infection holds significant promise, as both a challenge model for testing anti-hookworm therapies and for treating various diseases of modernity, there are many challenges that present. These challenges include preparation and storage of larvae, which has not significantly changed since Harada and Mori first described their coproculture method in 1955. In vitro methods of hookworm larval culture, storage, and the development of meaningful potency or release assays are required. Surrogate markers of intestinal infection intensity are required because faecal egg counts or hookworm faecal DNA intensity lack the fidelity required for exploration of hookworm infection as a vaccine/drug testing platform or as a regulated therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8659326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86593262021-12-10 Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review Chapman, Paul R. Giacomin, Paul Loukas, Alex McCarthy, James S. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review In 1896, a serendipitous laboratory accident led to the understanding that hookworms propagate infection by penetrating skin, a theory that was then confirmed with the first experimental human infection, reported in 1901. Experimental human infections undertaken in the 20th century enabled understanding of the natural history of infection and the immune response. More recently, experimental hookworm infection has been performed to investigate the immunomodulatory potential of hookworm infection and for the evaluation of hookworm vaccines and chemotherapeutic interventions. Experimental human hookworm infection has been proven to be safe, with no deaths observed in over 500 participants (although early reports predate systematic adverse event reporting) and no serious adverse events described in over 200 participants enrolled in contemporary clinical trials. While experimental human hookworm infection holds significant promise, as both a challenge model for testing anti-hookworm therapies and for treating various diseases of modernity, there are many challenges that present. These challenges include preparation and storage of larvae, which has not significantly changed since Harada and Mori first described their coproculture method in 1955. In vitro methods of hookworm larval culture, storage, and the development of meaningful potency or release assays are required. Surrogate markers of intestinal infection intensity are required because faecal egg counts or hookworm faecal DNA intensity lack the fidelity required for exploration of hookworm infection as a vaccine/drug testing platform or as a regulated therapy. Public Library of Science 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8659326/ /pubmed/34882670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009908 Text en © 2021 Chapman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Chapman, Paul R. Giacomin, Paul Loukas, Alex McCarthy, James S. Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title | Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title_full | Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title_fullStr | Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title_short | Experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
title_sort | experimental human hookworm infection: a narrative historical review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009908 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapmanpaulr experimentalhumanhookworminfectionanarrativehistoricalreview AT giacominpaul experimentalhumanhookworminfectionanarrativehistoricalreview AT loukasalex experimentalhumanhookworminfectionanarrativehistoricalreview AT mccarthyjamess experimentalhumanhookworminfectionanarrativehistoricalreview |