Cargando…

Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents

There are no physical or visual manifestations that define skin sensitivity or irritation; a subjective diagnosis is made on the basis of the evaluation of clinical presentations, including burning, prickling, erythema, and itching. Adverse skin reaction in response to topically applied products is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Amy L., Murdoch, Craig, Danby, Simon, Hasan, Md Zobaer, Nakanishi, Hirofumi, Furuno, Tetsuo, Hadad, Sirwan, Turner, Robert, Colley, Helen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100011
_version_ 1784612953550487552
author Harding, Amy L.
Murdoch, Craig
Danby, Simon
Hasan, Md Zobaer
Nakanishi, Hirofumi
Furuno, Tetsuo
Hadad, Sirwan
Turner, Robert
Colley, Helen E.
author_facet Harding, Amy L.
Murdoch, Craig
Danby, Simon
Hasan, Md Zobaer
Nakanishi, Hirofumi
Furuno, Tetsuo
Hadad, Sirwan
Turner, Robert
Colley, Helen E.
author_sort Harding, Amy L.
collection PubMed
description There are no physical or visual manifestations that define skin sensitivity or irritation; a subjective diagnosis is made on the basis of the evaluation of clinical presentations, including burning, prickling, erythema, and itching. Adverse skin reaction in response to topically applied products is common and can limit the use of dermatological or cosmetic products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of human skin equivalents based on immortalized skin keratinocytes and evaluate the potential of a 22-gene panel in combination with multivariate analysis to discriminate between chemicals known to act as irritants and those that do not. Test compounds were applied topically to full-thickness human skin equivalent or human ex vivo skin and gene signatures determined for known irritants and nonirritants. Principle component analysis showed the discriminatory potential of the 22-gene panel. Linear discrimination analysis, performed to further refine the gene set for a more high-throughput analysis, identified a putative seven-gene panel (IL-6, PTGS2, ATF3, TRPV3, MAP3K8, HMGB2, and matrix metalloproteinase gene MMP-3) that could distinguish potential irritants from nonirritants. These data offer promise as an in vitro prediction tool, although analysis of a large chemical test set is required to further evaluate the system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8659397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86593972021-12-13 Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents Harding, Amy L. Murdoch, Craig Danby, Simon Hasan, Md Zobaer Nakanishi, Hirofumi Furuno, Tetsuo Hadad, Sirwan Turner, Robert Colley, Helen E. JID Innov Original Article There are no physical or visual manifestations that define skin sensitivity or irritation; a subjective diagnosis is made on the basis of the evaluation of clinical presentations, including burning, prickling, erythema, and itching. Adverse skin reaction in response to topically applied products is common and can limit the use of dermatological or cosmetic products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of human skin equivalents based on immortalized skin keratinocytes and evaluate the potential of a 22-gene panel in combination with multivariate analysis to discriminate between chemicals known to act as irritants and those that do not. Test compounds were applied topically to full-thickness human skin equivalent or human ex vivo skin and gene signatures determined for known irritants and nonirritants. Principle component analysis showed the discriminatory potential of the 22-gene panel. Linear discrimination analysis, performed to further refine the gene set for a more high-throughput analysis, identified a putative seven-gene panel (IL-6, PTGS2, ATF3, TRPV3, MAP3K8, HMGB2, and matrix metalloproteinase gene MMP-3) that could distinguish potential irritants from nonirritants. These data offer promise as an in vitro prediction tool, although analysis of a large chemical test set is required to further evaluate the system. Elsevier 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8659397/ /pubmed/34909715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100011 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Harding, Amy L.
Murdoch, Craig
Danby, Simon
Hasan, Md Zobaer
Nakanishi, Hirofumi
Furuno, Tetsuo
Hadad, Sirwan
Turner, Robert
Colley, Helen E.
Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title_full Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title_fullStr Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title_short Determination of Chemical Irritation Potential Using a Defined Gene Signature Set on Tissue-Engineered Human Skin Equivalents
title_sort determination of chemical irritation potential using a defined gene signature set on tissue-engineered human skin equivalents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100011
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingamyl determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT murdochcraig determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT danbysimon determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT hasanmdzobaer determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT nakanishihirofumi determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT furunotetsuo determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT hadadsirwan determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT turnerrobert determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents
AT colleyhelene determinationofchemicalirritationpotentialusingadefinedgenesignaturesetontissueengineeredhumanskinequivalents