Cargando…

Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters

Investigating the coil–magnet structure plays a significant role in the design process of the electromagnetic energy harvester due to the effect on the harvester’s performance. In this paper, the performance of four different electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters with cylindrical shapes constr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phan, Tra Nguyen, Aranda, Jesus Javier, Oelmann, Bengt, Bader, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34883989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21237985
_version_ 1784612981986820096
author Phan, Tra Nguyen
Aranda, Jesus Javier
Oelmann, Bengt
Bader, Sebastian
author_facet Phan, Tra Nguyen
Aranda, Jesus Javier
Oelmann, Bengt
Bader, Sebastian
author_sort Phan, Tra Nguyen
collection PubMed
description Investigating the coil–magnet structure plays a significant role in the design process of the electromagnetic energy harvester due to the effect on the harvester’s performance. In this paper, the performance of four different electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters with cylindrical shapes constrained in the same volume were under investigation. The utilized structures are (i) two opposite polarized magnets spaced by a mild steel; (ii) a Halbach array with three magnets and one coil; (iii) a Halbach array with five magnets and one coil; and (iv) a Halbach array with five magnets and three coils. We utilized a completely automatic optimization procedure with the help of an optimization algorithm implemented in Python, supported by simulations in ANSYS Maxwell and MATLAB Simulink to obtain the maximum output power for each configuration. The simulation results show that the Halbach array with three magnets and one coil is the best for configurations with the Halbach array. Additionally, among all configurations, the harvester with two opposing magnets provides the highest output power and volume power density, while the Halbach array with three magnets and one coil provides the highest mass power density. The paper also demonstrates limitations of using the electromagnetic coupling coefficient as a metric for harvester optimization, if the ultimate goal is maximization of output power.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8659519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86595192021-12-10 Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters Phan, Tra Nguyen Aranda, Jesus Javier Oelmann, Bengt Bader, Sebastian Sensors (Basel) Article Investigating the coil–magnet structure plays a significant role in the design process of the electromagnetic energy harvester due to the effect on the harvester’s performance. In this paper, the performance of four different electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters with cylindrical shapes constrained in the same volume were under investigation. The utilized structures are (i) two opposite polarized magnets spaced by a mild steel; (ii) a Halbach array with three magnets and one coil; (iii) a Halbach array with five magnets and one coil; and (iv) a Halbach array with five magnets and three coils. We utilized a completely automatic optimization procedure with the help of an optimization algorithm implemented in Python, supported by simulations in ANSYS Maxwell and MATLAB Simulink to obtain the maximum output power for each configuration. The simulation results show that the Halbach array with three magnets and one coil is the best for configurations with the Halbach array. Additionally, among all configurations, the harvester with two opposing magnets provides the highest output power and volume power density, while the Halbach array with three magnets and one coil provides the highest mass power density. The paper also demonstrates limitations of using the electromagnetic coupling coefficient as a metric for harvester optimization, if the ultimate goal is maximization of output power. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8659519/ /pubmed/34883989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21237985 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Phan, Tra Nguyen
Aranda, Jesus Javier
Oelmann, Bengt
Bader, Sebastian
Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title_full Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title_fullStr Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title_full_unstemmed Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title_short Design Optimization and Comparison of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters
title_sort design optimization and comparison of cylindrical electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34883989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21237985
work_keys_str_mv AT phantranguyen designoptimizationandcomparisonofcylindricalelectromagneticvibrationenergyharvesters
AT arandajesusjavier designoptimizationandcomparisonofcylindricalelectromagneticvibrationenergyharvesters
AT oelmannbengt designoptimizationandcomparisonofcylindricalelectromagneticvibrationenergyharvesters
AT badersebastian designoptimizationandcomparisonofcylindricalelectromagneticvibrationenergyharvesters