Cargando…
Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting
Data-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. However, despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21238009 |
_version_ | 1784612985495355392 |
---|---|
author | Murad, Abdulmajid Kraemer, Frank Alexander Bach, Kerstin Taylor, Gavin |
author_facet | Murad, Abdulmajid Kraemer, Frank Alexander Bach, Kerstin Taylor, Gavin |
author_sort | Murad, Abdulmajid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. However, despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical tools to estimate uncertainty have been developed in probabilistic deep learning. However, there have not been empirical applications and extensive comparisons of these tools in the domain of air quality forecasts. Therefore, this work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. Through extensive experiments, we describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. We also propose improving these models using “free” adversarial training and exploiting temporal and spatial correlation inherent in air quality data. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed models perform better than previous works in quantifying uncertainty in data-driven air quality forecasts. Overall, Bayesian neural networks provide a more reliable uncertainty estimate but can be challenging to implement and scale. Other scalable methods, such as deep ensemble, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, and stochastic weight averaging-Gaussian (SWAG), can perform well if applied correctly but with different tradeoffs and slight variations in performance metrics. Finally, our results show the practical impact of uncertainty estimation and demonstrate that, indeed, probabilistic models are more suitable for making informed decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8659533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86595332021-12-10 Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting Murad, Abdulmajid Kraemer, Frank Alexander Bach, Kerstin Taylor, Gavin Sensors (Basel) Article Data-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. However, despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical tools to estimate uncertainty have been developed in probabilistic deep learning. However, there have not been empirical applications and extensive comparisons of these tools in the domain of air quality forecasts. Therefore, this work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. Through extensive experiments, we describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. We also propose improving these models using “free” adversarial training and exploiting temporal and spatial correlation inherent in air quality data. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed models perform better than previous works in quantifying uncertainty in data-driven air quality forecasts. Overall, Bayesian neural networks provide a more reliable uncertainty estimate but can be challenging to implement and scale. Other scalable methods, such as deep ensemble, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, and stochastic weight averaging-Gaussian (SWAG), can perform well if applied correctly but with different tradeoffs and slight variations in performance metrics. Finally, our results show the practical impact of uncertainty estimation and demonstrate that, indeed, probabilistic models are more suitable for making informed decisions. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8659533/ /pubmed/34884011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21238009 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Murad, Abdulmajid Kraemer, Frank Alexander Bach, Kerstin Taylor, Gavin Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title | Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title_full | Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title_fullStr | Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title_full_unstemmed | Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title_short | Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting |
title_sort | probabilistic deep learning to quantify uncertainty in air quality forecasting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34884011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21238009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muradabdulmajid probabilisticdeeplearningtoquantifyuncertaintyinairqualityforecasting AT kraemerfrankalexander probabilisticdeeplearningtoquantifyuncertaintyinairqualityforecasting AT bachkerstin probabilisticdeeplearningtoquantifyuncertaintyinairqualityforecasting AT taylorgavin probabilisticdeeplearningtoquantifyuncertaintyinairqualityforecasting |