Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews

Measuring patient satisfaction of general dermatology providers is an important goal because it can lead to improved clinical outcomes. Online reviews are emerging as the newest forum for evaluating physicians in real time and provide a valuable tool for measuring patient satisfaction. We analyzed b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Queen, Dawn, Trager, Megan H., Fan, Weijia, Samie, Faramarz H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100049
_version_ 1784613034633723904
author Queen, Dawn
Trager, Megan H.
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
author_facet Queen, Dawn
Trager, Megan H.
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
author_sort Queen, Dawn
collection PubMed
description Measuring patient satisfaction of general dermatology providers is an important goal because it can lead to improved clinical outcomes. Online reviews are emerging as the newest forum for evaluating physicians in real time and provide a valuable tool for measuring patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of general dermatology providers at 121 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited dermatology programs across the country to determine which elements are most discussed in online ratings using the online platforms Vitals, US News, WebMD, Google Reviews, and Healthgrades. There were 38,008 online reviews included from general dermatology providers at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited programs. The median average overall quantitative rating of providers was 4.35 of 5. There were more positive (77%) than negative (23%) comments. The overall ratings of general dermatology providers were favorable. The most influential factors in both positive and negative comments were patient’s perceived experience and physician’s bedside manner (26% and 17%, respectively). Less important factors included office space, treatment by auxiliary staff, wait time, costs, and time spent with patients. This suggests that a provider’s personality, expressed compassion, empathy, and kindness may overcome other issues and create an overall positive experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8659734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86597342021-12-13 Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews Queen, Dawn Trager, Megan H. Fan, Weijia Samie, Faramarz H. JID Innov Original Article Measuring patient satisfaction of general dermatology providers is an important goal because it can lead to improved clinical outcomes. Online reviews are emerging as the newest forum for evaluating physicians in real time and provide a valuable tool for measuring patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of general dermatology providers at 121 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited dermatology programs across the country to determine which elements are most discussed in online ratings using the online platforms Vitals, US News, WebMD, Google Reviews, and Healthgrades. There were 38,008 online reviews included from general dermatology providers at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited programs. The median average overall quantitative rating of providers was 4.35 of 5. There were more positive (77%) than negative (23%) comments. The overall ratings of general dermatology providers were favorable. The most influential factors in both positive and negative comments were patient’s perceived experience and physician’s bedside manner (26% and 17%, respectively). Less important factors included office space, treatment by auxiliary staff, wait time, costs, and time spent with patients. This suggests that a provider’s personality, expressed compassion, empathy, and kindness may overcome other issues and create an overall positive experience. Elsevier 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8659734/ /pubmed/34909746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100049 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Society for Investigative Dermatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Queen, Dawn
Trager, Megan H.
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title_full Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title_short Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews
title_sort patient satisfaction of general dermatology providers: a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 38,008 online reviews
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100049
work_keys_str_mv AT queendawn patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologyprovidersaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviews
AT tragermeganh patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologyprovidersaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviews
AT fanweijia patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologyprovidersaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviews
AT samiefaramarzh patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologyprovidersaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviews