Cargando…

Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether social network size and allostatic load (AL) mediated the association between multiple group membership (MGM) and future physical and psychological well-being. METHODS: A longitudinal design was used and data from 1026 healthy participants on the relevant vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephen, Gallagher, Muldoon Orla, T., Bennett Kate, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110636
_version_ 1784613105202888704
author Stephen, Gallagher
Muldoon Orla, T.
Bennett Kate, M.
author_facet Stephen, Gallagher
Muldoon Orla, T.
Bennett Kate, M.
author_sort Stephen, Gallagher
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether social network size and allostatic load (AL) mediated the association between multiple group membership (MGM) and future physical and psychological well-being. METHODS: A longitudinal design was used and data from 1026 healthy participants on the relevant variables was extracted from Wave 2(2010−12), Wave 3 (2011−2013) (for baseline MGM, social network size and AL) and Wave 9 (2017–19) (for well-being at follow-up) of the Understanding Society UK population-based dataset. RESULTS: MGM was not directly associated with future well-being, but both social network size, β = 0.06, t = 2.02, p = .04, and AL, β = −0.06, t = −2.05, p = .04, were associated with physical but not psychological well-being at follow-up. Those who had higher numbers of friends had better physical well-being, and those who had lower AL risk scores had better physical well-being at follow-up. However, MGM was indirectly associated with physical well-being through social network size, and AL such that those reporting higher MGM, reported a greater number of friends which was associated with a lower AL and then future physical well-being, β = 0.004, CI [0.001., 0.0129]. This was not evident for psychological well-being. This mediation withstood adjustment for confounding factors (e.g. age, gender, marital status lifestyle factors). CONCLUSION: The present study extends findings on the existing social relationships and social cure literature and our findings are discussed in relation to the social cure hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8660054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86600542021-12-21 Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis Stephen, Gallagher Muldoon Orla, T. Bennett Kate, M. J Psychosom Res Article OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether social network size and allostatic load (AL) mediated the association between multiple group membership (MGM) and future physical and psychological well-being. METHODS: A longitudinal design was used and data from 1026 healthy participants on the relevant variables was extracted from Wave 2(2010−12), Wave 3 (2011−2013) (for baseline MGM, social network size and AL) and Wave 9 (2017–19) (for well-being at follow-up) of the Understanding Society UK population-based dataset. RESULTS: MGM was not directly associated with future well-being, but both social network size, β = 0.06, t = 2.02, p = .04, and AL, β = −0.06, t = −2.05, p = .04, were associated with physical but not psychological well-being at follow-up. Those who had higher numbers of friends had better physical well-being, and those who had lower AL risk scores had better physical well-being at follow-up. However, MGM was indirectly associated with physical well-being through social network size, and AL such that those reporting higher MGM, reported a greater number of friends which was associated with a lower AL and then future physical well-being, β = 0.004, CI [0.001., 0.0129]. This was not evident for psychological well-being. This mediation withstood adjustment for confounding factors (e.g. age, gender, marital status lifestyle factors). CONCLUSION: The present study extends findings on the existing social relationships and social cure literature and our findings are discussed in relation to the social cure hypothesis. Pergamon Press 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8660054/ /pubmed/34638016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110636 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stephen, Gallagher
Muldoon Orla, T.
Bennett Kate, M.
Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title_full Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title_fullStr Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title_full_unstemmed Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title_short Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: A mediation analysis
title_sort multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being: a mediation analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110636
work_keys_str_mv AT stephengallagher multiplegroupmembershipsocialnetworksizeallostaticloadandwellbeingamediationanalysis
AT muldoonorlat multiplegroupmembershipsocialnetworksizeallostaticloadandwellbeingamediationanalysis
AT bennettkatem multiplegroupmembershipsocialnetworksizeallostaticloadandwellbeingamediationanalysis