Cargando…

Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing

Throughout the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the recommended sample type for initial diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a nasopharyngeal swab. Shortages in swabs and difficulties in obtaining nasopharyngeal swabs in certain patient groups has prompted research into alternative speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connor, M.C., Copeland, M., Curran, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105053
_version_ 1784613122704670720
author Connor, M.C.
Copeland, M.
Curran, T.
author_facet Connor, M.C.
Copeland, M.
Curran, T.
author_sort Connor, M.C.
collection PubMed
description Throughout the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the recommended sample type for initial diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a nasopharyngeal swab. Shortages in swabs and difficulties in obtaining nasopharyngeal swabs in certain patient groups has prompted research into alternative specimen types for the diagnosis of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to assess how ‘simply collected’ saliva along with tongue swabs and buccal swabs preformed as an alternative specimen type for SARS-CoV-2 detection. It was observed that saliva samples allowed for the detection of 85.3% of positive patients, tongue swabs allowed for the detection of 67.6% of positive patients and buccal swabs allowed for detection of 20.8% of positive patients, when compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. From this data, it could be concluded that using simple saliva collection can provide a less invasive and reliable alternative method for the detection of SARS-CoV2 particularly in those patients where invasive sampling is difficult and where regular repeat testing is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8660128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86601282021-12-10 Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing Connor, M.C. Copeland, M. Curran, T. J Clin Virol Article Throughout the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the recommended sample type for initial diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a nasopharyngeal swab. Shortages in swabs and difficulties in obtaining nasopharyngeal swabs in certain patient groups has prompted research into alternative specimen types for the diagnosis of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to assess how ‘simply collected’ saliva along with tongue swabs and buccal swabs preformed as an alternative specimen type for SARS-CoV-2 detection. It was observed that saliva samples allowed for the detection of 85.3% of positive patients, tongue swabs allowed for the detection of 67.6% of positive patients and buccal swabs allowed for detection of 20.8% of positive patients, when compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. From this data, it could be concluded that using simple saliva collection can provide a less invasive and reliable alternative method for the detection of SARS-CoV2 particularly in those patients where invasive sampling is difficult and where regular repeat testing is required. Elsevier B.V. 2022-01 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8660128/ /pubmed/34920375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105053 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Connor, M.C.
Copeland, M.
Curran, T.
Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title_full Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title_fullStr Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title_short Investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing
title_sort investigation of saliva, tongue swabs and buccal swabs as alternative specimen types to nasopharyngeal swabs for sars-cov-2 testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105053
work_keys_str_mv AT connormc investigationofsalivatongueswabsandbuccalswabsasalternativespecimentypestonasopharyngealswabsforsarscov2testing
AT copelandm investigationofsalivatongueswabsandbuccalswabsasalternativespecimentypestonasopharyngealswabsforsarscov2testing
AT currant investigationofsalivatongueswabsandbuccalswabsasalternativespecimentypestonasopharyngealswabsforsarscov2testing