Cargando…
Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice
Potential cochlear implant (CI) candidates arrive to the clinic with a variety of hearing loss configurations, hearing aid history, and aided capabilities. CI candidacy is primarily determined based on aided speech recognition capability, which relies on benefit derived from use of hearing aids. The...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739369 |
_version_ | 1784613130412752896 |
---|---|
author | Sydlowski, Sarah A. King, Michelle Petter, Karen Bachmann, Meagan Lewis |
author_facet | Sydlowski, Sarah A. King, Michelle Petter, Karen Bachmann, Meagan Lewis |
author_sort | Sydlowski, Sarah A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Potential cochlear implant (CI) candidates arrive to the clinic with a variety of hearing loss configurations, hearing aid history, and aided capabilities. CI candidacy is primarily determined based on aided speech recognition capability, which relies on benefit derived from use of hearing aids. Therefore, contemporary evaluation for CI candidacy should incorporate a battery of testing to determine abilities and limitations and must be predicated on appropriate verification of the hearing aid fitting. However, recent reports, including a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to Cleveland Clinic for CI evaluation, suggest that a significant subset of patients may be using inappropriately fit or programmed amplification. Thus, a combination of simulated real-ear measurements and aided speech recognition testing is essential for fully assessing the effect of amplification and ultimately determination of CI candidacy. Furthermore, waiting to incorporate these tools until CI candidacy is suspected may delay timely identification of problems or need to change technology. Utilization of evidence-based decision drivers ultimately leads clinicians to timely patient-specific interventions which may include surgical intervention or other amplification options. As audiology moves into a healthcare era in which payers consider the benefit of our services to overall health and well-being, demonstrating timely, optimal outcomes using thorough, multifactorial evaluation is essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8660166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86601662021-12-17 Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice Sydlowski, Sarah A. King, Michelle Petter, Karen Bachmann, Meagan Lewis Semin Hear Potential cochlear implant (CI) candidates arrive to the clinic with a variety of hearing loss configurations, hearing aid history, and aided capabilities. CI candidacy is primarily determined based on aided speech recognition capability, which relies on benefit derived from use of hearing aids. Therefore, contemporary evaluation for CI candidacy should incorporate a battery of testing to determine abilities and limitations and must be predicated on appropriate verification of the hearing aid fitting. However, recent reports, including a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to Cleveland Clinic for CI evaluation, suggest that a significant subset of patients may be using inappropriately fit or programmed amplification. Thus, a combination of simulated real-ear measurements and aided speech recognition testing is essential for fully assessing the effect of amplification and ultimately determination of CI candidacy. Furthermore, waiting to incorporate these tools until CI candidacy is suspected may delay timely identification of problems or need to change technology. Utilization of evidence-based decision drivers ultimately leads clinicians to timely patient-specific interventions which may include surgical intervention or other amplification options. As audiology moves into a healthcare era in which payers consider the benefit of our services to overall health and well-being, demonstrating timely, optimal outcomes using thorough, multifactorial evaluation is essential. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8660166/ /pubmed/34912164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739369 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sydlowski, Sarah A. King, Michelle Petter, Karen Bachmann, Meagan Lewis Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title | Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title_full | Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title_fullStr | Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title_short | Functional Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit: Incorporating Verification and Aided Speech Recognition Testing into Routine Practice |
title_sort | functional assessment of hearing aid benefit: incorporating verification and aided speech recognition testing into routine practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sydlowskisaraha functionalassessmentofhearingaidbenefitincorporatingverificationandaidedspeechrecognitiontestingintoroutinepractice AT kingmichelle functionalassessmentofhearingaidbenefitincorporatingverificationandaidedspeechrecognitiontestingintoroutinepractice AT petterkaren functionalassessmentofhearingaidbenefitincorporatingverificationandaidedspeechrecognitiontestingintoroutinepractice AT bachmannmeaganlewis functionalassessmentofhearingaidbenefitincorporatingverificationandaidedspeechrecognitiontestingintoroutinepractice |