Cargando…
Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x |
_version_ | 1784613249934688256 |
---|---|
author | Laskowski, Dominik Feger, Sarah Bosserdt, Maria Zimmermann, Elke Mohamed, Mahmoud Kendziora, Benjamin Rief, Matthias Dreger, Henryk Estrella, Melanie Dewey, Marc |
author_facet | Laskowski, Dominik Feger, Sarah Bosserdt, Maria Zimmermann, Elke Mohamed, Mahmoud Kendziora, Benjamin Rief, Matthias Dreger, Henryk Estrella, Melanie Dewey, Marc |
author_sort | Laskowski, Dominik |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. RESULTS: ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT Unique ID: 00844220 KEY POINTS: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8660731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86607312021-12-27 Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography Laskowski, Dominik Feger, Sarah Bosserdt, Maria Zimmermann, Elke Mohamed, Mahmoud Kendziora, Benjamin Rief, Matthias Dreger, Henryk Estrella, Melanie Dewey, Marc Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. RESULTS: ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT Unique ID: 00844220 KEY POINTS: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8660731/ /pubmed/34129067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiac Laskowski, Dominik Feger, Sarah Bosserdt, Maria Zimmermann, Elke Mohamed, Mahmoud Kendziora, Benjamin Rief, Matthias Dreger, Henryk Estrella, Melanie Dewey, Marc Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title | Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title_full | Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title_fullStr | Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title_short | Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
title_sort | detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography |
topic | Cardiac |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laskowskidominik detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT fegersarah detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT bosserdtmaria detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT zimmermannelke detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT mohamedmahmoud detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT kendziorabenjamin detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT riefmatthias detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT dregerhenryk detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT estrellamelanie detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography AT deweymarc detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography |