Cargando…

Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography

OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laskowski, Dominik, Feger, Sarah, Bosserdt, Maria, Zimmermann, Elke, Mohamed, Mahmoud, Kendziora, Benjamin, Rief, Matthias, Dreger, Henryk, Estrella, Melanie, Dewey, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x
_version_ 1784613249934688256
author Laskowski, Dominik
Feger, Sarah
Bosserdt, Maria
Zimmermann, Elke
Mohamed, Mahmoud
Kendziora, Benjamin
Rief, Matthias
Dreger, Henryk
Estrella, Melanie
Dewey, Marc
author_facet Laskowski, Dominik
Feger, Sarah
Bosserdt, Maria
Zimmermann, Elke
Mohamed, Mahmoud
Kendziora, Benjamin
Rief, Matthias
Dreger, Henryk
Estrella, Melanie
Dewey, Marc
author_sort Laskowski, Dominik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. RESULTS: ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT Unique ID: 00844220 KEY POINTS: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8660731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86607312021-12-27 Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography Laskowski, Dominik Feger, Sarah Bosserdt, Maria Zimmermann, Elke Mohamed, Mahmoud Kendziora, Benjamin Rief, Matthias Dreger, Henryk Estrella, Melanie Dewey, Marc Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. METHODS: This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. RESULTS: ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT Unique ID: 00844220 KEY POINTS: • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8660731/ /pubmed/34129067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiac
Laskowski, Dominik
Feger, Sarah
Bosserdt, Maria
Zimmermann, Elke
Mohamed, Mahmoud
Kendziora, Benjamin
Rief, Matthias
Dreger, Henryk
Estrella, Melanie
Dewey, Marc
Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title_full Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title_fullStr Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title_full_unstemmed Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title_short Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
title_sort detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07967-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laskowskidominik detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT fegersarah detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT bosserdtmaria detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT zimmermannelke detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT mohamedmahmoud detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT kendziorabenjamin detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT riefmatthias detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT dregerhenryk detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT estrellamelanie detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography
AT deweymarc detectionofrelevantextracardiacfindingsoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyvsinvasivecoronaryangiography