Cargando…

The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size

The naiads, large freshwater mussels (Unionida), have very long life spans, are large-bodied, and produce thousands to millions of larvae (glochidia) which typically must attach to host fish tissues to metamorphose into a juvenile mussel. Glochidia develop within a female's marsupial gill demib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ćmiel, Adam M., Dołęga, Jacek, Aldridge, David C., Lipińska, Anna, Tang, Feng, Zając, Katarzyna, Lopes-Lima, Manuel, Zając, Tadeusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03143-9
_version_ 1784613286667354112
author Ćmiel, Adam M.
Dołęga, Jacek
Aldridge, David C.
Lipińska, Anna
Tang, Feng
Zając, Katarzyna
Lopes-Lima, Manuel
Zając, Tadeusz
author_facet Ćmiel, Adam M.
Dołęga, Jacek
Aldridge, David C.
Lipińska, Anna
Tang, Feng
Zając, Katarzyna
Lopes-Lima, Manuel
Zając, Tadeusz
author_sort Ćmiel, Adam M.
collection PubMed
description The naiads, large freshwater mussels (Unionida), have very long life spans, are large-bodied, and produce thousands to millions of larvae (glochidia) which typically must attach to host fish tissues to metamorphose into a juvenile mussel. Glochidia develop within a female's marsupial gill demibranch, thus their number is restricted by female size. However, larger mussels acquire more energy, which could be invested in either larger-sized glochidia, in a more glochidia, or a combination of both. The high level of host specialization seen in many naiads may constrain glochidial size and shape around a narrow optimum, while naiads that use a wide range of host fishes may be predicted to possess greater plasticity in glochidial morphology. In this paper, we investigated the relationship between maternal body size and progeny body size and shape, aided by modern digital microscopy. We analyzed the between- and within- species variation of glochidia size and shape relative to female size in four widespread species of European naiads: Anodonta anatina, Anodonta cygnea, Unio crassus and Unio tumidus. Whereas the total reproductive output is collinear with female body size, substantial differences between species in glochidia size were found within genus Anodonta, but not genus Unio where glochidial size is remarkably consistent. The glochidial shape, however, differed within both Unio and Anodonta. We interpret this constant within-species glochidial size in Unio as reflecting a constraint imposed by the likelihood of successful transmission onto and off from a narrow range of hosts, whereas their shape seems to be less constrained. The Anodonta species, inhabiting a wide spectrum of habitats and using more than twice the number of fish hosts than Unio spp., have larger glochidia with greater variation in size and shape. Our results suggest that measures of glochidial variability may also serve as an indicator of host specificity in other naiads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8660881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86608812021-12-13 The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size Ćmiel, Adam M. Dołęga, Jacek Aldridge, David C. Lipińska, Anna Tang, Feng Zając, Katarzyna Lopes-Lima, Manuel Zając, Tadeusz Sci Rep Article The naiads, large freshwater mussels (Unionida), have very long life spans, are large-bodied, and produce thousands to millions of larvae (glochidia) which typically must attach to host fish tissues to metamorphose into a juvenile mussel. Glochidia develop within a female's marsupial gill demibranch, thus their number is restricted by female size. However, larger mussels acquire more energy, which could be invested in either larger-sized glochidia, in a more glochidia, or a combination of both. The high level of host specialization seen in many naiads may constrain glochidial size and shape around a narrow optimum, while naiads that use a wide range of host fishes may be predicted to possess greater plasticity in glochidial morphology. In this paper, we investigated the relationship between maternal body size and progeny body size and shape, aided by modern digital microscopy. We analyzed the between- and within- species variation of glochidia size and shape relative to female size in four widespread species of European naiads: Anodonta anatina, Anodonta cygnea, Unio crassus and Unio tumidus. Whereas the total reproductive output is collinear with female body size, substantial differences between species in glochidia size were found within genus Anodonta, but not genus Unio where glochidial size is remarkably consistent. The glochidial shape, however, differed within both Unio and Anodonta. We interpret this constant within-species glochidial size in Unio as reflecting a constraint imposed by the likelihood of successful transmission onto and off from a narrow range of hosts, whereas their shape seems to be less constrained. The Anodonta species, inhabiting a wide spectrum of habitats and using more than twice the number of fish hosts than Unio spp., have larger glochidia with greater variation in size and shape. Our results suggest that measures of glochidial variability may also serve as an indicator of host specificity in other naiads. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8660881/ /pubmed/34887477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03143-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ćmiel, Adam M.
Dołęga, Jacek
Aldridge, David C.
Lipińska, Anna
Tang, Feng
Zając, Katarzyna
Lopes-Lima, Manuel
Zając, Tadeusz
The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title_full The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title_fullStr The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title_full_unstemmed The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title_short The size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (Unionidae) are not dependent on female size
title_sort size and shape of parasitic larvae of naiads (unionidae) are not dependent on female size
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03143-9
work_keys_str_mv AT cmieladamm thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT dołegajacek thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT aldridgedavidc thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT lipinskaanna thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT tangfeng thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT zajackatarzyna thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT lopeslimamanuel thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT zajactadeusz thesizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT cmieladamm sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT dołegajacek sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT aldridgedavidc sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT lipinskaanna sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT tangfeng sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT zajackatarzyna sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT lopeslimamanuel sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize
AT zajactadeusz sizeandshapeofparasiticlarvaeofnaiadsunionidaearenotdependentonfemalesize