Cargando…
Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984188 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912 |
_version_ | 1784613329114759168 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jiafu Han, Yue Lin, Lin Zhang, Linhan Li, Jin Gao, Huiqi Fu, Peng |
author_facet | Wang, Jiafu Han, Yue Lin, Lin Zhang, Linhan Li, Jin Gao, Huiqi Fu, Peng |
author_sort | Wang, Jiafu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody ((68)Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS. RESULTS: Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034. DISCUSSION: The meta-analysis showed that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8661258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86612582022-01-03 Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions Wang, Jiafu Han, Yue Lin, Lin Zhang, Linhan Li, Jin Gao, Huiqi Fu, Peng Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody ((68)Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS. RESULTS: Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034. DISCUSSION: The meta-analysis showed that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases. AME Publishing Company 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8661258/ /pubmed/34984188 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Jiafu Han, Yue Lin, Lin Zhang, Linhan Li, Jin Gao, Huiqi Fu, Peng Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title | Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title_full | Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title_fullStr | Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title_short | Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
title_sort | systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984188 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjiafu systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT hanyue systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT linlin systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT zhanglinhan systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT lijin systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT gaohuiqi systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions AT fupeng systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions |