Cargando…

Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions

BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jiafu, Han, Yue, Lin, Lin, Zhang, Linhan, Li, Jin, Gao, Huiqi, Fu, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984188
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912
_version_ 1784613329114759168
author Wang, Jiafu
Han, Yue
Lin, Lin
Zhang, Linhan
Li, Jin
Gao, Huiqi
Fu, Peng
author_facet Wang, Jiafu
Han, Yue
Lin, Lin
Zhang, Linhan
Li, Jin
Gao, Huiqi
Fu, Peng
author_sort Wang, Jiafu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody ((68)Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS. RESULTS: Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034. DISCUSSION: The meta-analysis showed that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8661258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86612582022-01-03 Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions Wang, Jiafu Han, Yue Lin, Lin Zhang, Linhan Li, Jin Gao, Huiqi Fu, Peng Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: To date, the results of studies into the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) in the diagnosis of malignant prostate lesions have been inconsistent, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods cannot be accurately judged. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wan Fang Medical Network, PubMed, Excerpta Medica data BASE (EMBASE), Medline, and Cochrane database. The keywords used in the search were: (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antibody ((68)Ga-PSMA), PET/CT, prostate lesions, prostate adenocarcinoma, bone metastasis, and BS. RESULTS: Ultimately, 3 publications were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 215 patients were considered in the 3 articles that met the inclusion criteria. All of the included articles were small sample studies, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 113 cases. In this study, from the 3 randomized controlled trials, only 2 (66.67%) randomized controls described the correct randomized allocation method, and only 1 (33.33%) described the hidden allocation scheme in detail. The highest sensitivity for (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 0.96, with 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00, and the highest specificity was 1.00, with 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00. The highest sensitivity and specificity of BS were 0.92 with 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98 and 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.78, 1.00, respectively. The results of meta-analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) =0.826 and standard error (SE) (AUC) =0.0425. The results of meta-analysis of BS diagnosis with confirmation by surgical and histopathological examination showed that the area under the SROC curve (AUC) =0.714 and SE (AUC) =0.0034. DISCUSSION: The meta-analysis showed that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has clear advantages over BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases of malignant prostate tumors, and could improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases. AME Publishing Company 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8661258/ /pubmed/34984188 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Jiafu
Han, Yue
Lin, Lin
Zhang, Linhan
Li, Jin
Gao, Huiqi
Fu, Peng
Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title_full Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title_fullStr Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title_short Systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
title_sort systematic review & meta-analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scan in the diagnosis of prostate lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984188
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-912
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjiafu systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT hanyue systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT linlin systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT zhanglinhan systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT lijin systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT gaohuiqi systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions
AT fupeng systematicreviewmetaanalysisofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandbonescaninthediagnosisofprostatelesions