Cargando…

A novel approach in creating nephrostomy using a double-lumen access sheath during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an inner ureteral access sheath (i-UAS) with a double-lumen channel used in ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) as a dilator for the percutaneous tract in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). METHODS: This was a single-center...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unno, Rei, Taguchi, Kazumi, Hamamoto, Shuzo, Hattori, Tatsuya, Kawase, Kengo, Okada, Tomoki, Chaya, Ryosuke, Tanaka, Yutaro, Sugino, Teruaki, Kato, Taiki, Etani, Toshiki, Ando, Ryosuke, Okada, Atsushi, Yasui, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984184
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-611
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an inner ureteral access sheath (i-UAS) with a double-lumen channel used in ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) as a dilator for the percutaneous tract in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study conducted from January 2016 to April 2020. We used an i-UAS as a dilator and a double-lumen catheter to insert a safety guidewire during the creation of the nephrostomy tract in ECIRS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between the perioperative parameters and the use of i-UAS. The primary endpoint was perioperative complications, and secondary endpoints were stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, fluoroscopy time, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 221 patients were enrolled during the study period. Patients were divided into an i-UAS dilation group (n=108) and a one-shot dilation group (n=113). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient history. Univariate analyses indicated that, in the i-UAS dilation group, the operative time was shorter [105.50 (83.75–143.25) vs. 121.00 (90.00–155.00) min; P=0.02] and the modified Valdivia position was more frequently selected. Multivariate analyses showed no significant differences in the frequency of complications, such as urinary injury or postoperative pyelonephritis, but it showed a significantly shorter operative time as well as fewer tract creation troubles in the i-UAS dilation group. CONCLUSIONS: Using an i-UAS as a dilator and a double-lumen catheter to insert a safety guidewire during ECIRS is a convenient and safe technical method for creating a nephrostomy tract that can reduce the operative time.