Cargando…

Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are miracles of science and critical for many surgical procedures. However, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens resulting from inappropriate antibiotic use is a threat to modern medicine. This study aimed to determine the appropriateness of antibiotic use, cost, co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashar, Muhammad A., Miot, Jacqui, Shoul, Evan, van Zyl, Robyn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917678
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.307
_version_ 1784613337757122560
author Bashar, Muhammad A.
Miot, Jacqui
Shoul, Evan
van Zyl, Robyn L.
author_facet Bashar, Muhammad A.
Miot, Jacqui
Shoul, Evan
van Zyl, Robyn L.
author_sort Bashar, Muhammad A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are miracles of science and critical for many surgical procedures. However, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens resulting from inappropriate antibiotic use is a threat to modern medicine. This study aimed to determine the appropriateness of antibiotic use, cost, consumption and impact of an antibiotic stewardship intervention round in a surgical ward setting. METHODS: Baseline antibiotic utilisation was determined with a retrospective cross-sectional study in two surgical wards in a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa where medical records of 264 patients who received antibiotics were reviewed. In the second stage of the study, records of 212 patients who received antibiotics were reviewed during a weekly antibiotic stewardship intervention round. The volume of antibiotics consumed was determined using defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 patients’ days, and the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescription for treatment was also determined using a quality-of-use algorithm. RESULTS: There was a reduction in the volume of antibiotic consumption from a total 739.30 DDDs/1000 to 564.93 DDDs/1000 patient days, with reduction in inappropriate antibiotic use from 35% to 26% from baseline to antibiotic stewardship programme stages, respectively. There was an overall increase in culture targeted therapy in both wards in the antibiotic stewardship programme stage. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an antibiotic stewardship programme led to a reduction in antibiotic consumption and improvement in appropriate use of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8661296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86612962021-12-15 Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting Bashar, Muhammad A. Miot, Jacqui Shoul, Evan van Zyl, Robyn L. S Afr J Infect Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are miracles of science and critical for many surgical procedures. However, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens resulting from inappropriate antibiotic use is a threat to modern medicine. This study aimed to determine the appropriateness of antibiotic use, cost, consumption and impact of an antibiotic stewardship intervention round in a surgical ward setting. METHODS: Baseline antibiotic utilisation was determined with a retrospective cross-sectional study in two surgical wards in a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa where medical records of 264 patients who received antibiotics were reviewed. In the second stage of the study, records of 212 patients who received antibiotics were reviewed during a weekly antibiotic stewardship intervention round. The volume of antibiotics consumed was determined using defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 patients’ days, and the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescription for treatment was also determined using a quality-of-use algorithm. RESULTS: There was a reduction in the volume of antibiotic consumption from a total 739.30 DDDs/1000 to 564.93 DDDs/1000 patient days, with reduction in inappropriate antibiotic use from 35% to 26% from baseline to antibiotic stewardship programme stages, respectively. There was an overall increase in culture targeted therapy in both wards in the antibiotic stewardship programme stage. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an antibiotic stewardship programme led to a reduction in antibiotic consumption and improvement in appropriate use of antibiotics. AOSIS 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8661296/ /pubmed/34917678 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.307 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bashar, Muhammad A.
Miot, Jacqui
Shoul, Evan
van Zyl, Robyn L.
Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title_full Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title_fullStr Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title_short Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
title_sort impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917678
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.307
work_keys_str_mv AT basharmuhammada impactofanantibioticstewardshipprogrammeinasurgicalsetting
AT miotjacqui impactofanantibioticstewardshipprogrammeinasurgicalsetting
AT shoulevan impactofanantibioticstewardshipprogrammeinasurgicalsetting
AT vanzylrobynl impactofanantibioticstewardshipprogrammeinasurgicalsetting