Cargando…

The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the effects of femoral drilling angle in coronal and sagittal planes on the stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance and the stress distribution on the graft, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstructio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Rongshan, Wang, Huizhi, Jiang, Ziang, Dimitriou, Dimitris, Cheng, Cheng-Kung, Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.797389
_version_ 1784613370148683776
author Cheng, Rongshan
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
author_facet Cheng, Rongshan
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
author_sort Cheng, Rongshan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the effects of femoral drilling angle in coronal and sagittal planes on the stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance and the stress distribution on the graft, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), 2) identify the optimal femoral drilling angle to reduce the risk of the tunnel enlargement and graft failure. Methods: A validated three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a healthy right cadaveric knee was used to simulate an anatomic ACLR with the anteromedial (AM) portal technique. Combined loading of 103.0 N anterior tibial load, 7.5 Nm internal rotation moment, and 6.9 Nm valgus moment during normal human walking at joint flexion of 20° was applied to the ACLR knee models using different tunnel angles (30°/45°/60° and 45°/60° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively). The distribution of von Mises stress and strain around the tunnel entrances and the graft was calculated and compared among the different finite element ACLR models with varying femoral drilling angles. Results: With an increasing coronal obliquity drilling angle (30° to 60°), the peak stress and maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel decreased from 30° to 45° and increased from 45° to 60°, respectively. With an increasing sagittal obliquity drilling angle (45° to 60°), the peak stress and the maximum strain on the bone tunnels increased. The lowest peak stress and maximum strain at the ACL tunnels were observed at 45° coronal/45° sagittal drilling angle (7.5 MPa and 7,568.3 μ-strain at the femoral tunnel entrance, and 4.0 MPa and 4,128.7 μ-strain at the tibial tunnel entrance). The lowest peak stress on the ACL graft occurred at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (27.8 MPa) drilling angle. Conclusions: The femoral tunnel drilling angle could affect both the stress and strain distribution on the femoral tunnel, tibial tunnel, and graft. A femoral tunnel drilling angle of 45° coronal/ 45° sagittal demonstrated the lowest peak stress, maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance, and the lowest peak stress on the ACL graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8661475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86614752021-12-11 The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Cheng, Rongshan Wang, Huizhi Jiang, Ziang Dimitriou, Dimitris Cheng, Cheng-Kung Tsai, Tsung-Yuan Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the effects of femoral drilling angle in coronal and sagittal planes on the stress and strain distribution around the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance and the stress distribution on the graft, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), 2) identify the optimal femoral drilling angle to reduce the risk of the tunnel enlargement and graft failure. Methods: A validated three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a healthy right cadaveric knee was used to simulate an anatomic ACLR with the anteromedial (AM) portal technique. Combined loading of 103.0 N anterior tibial load, 7.5 Nm internal rotation moment, and 6.9 Nm valgus moment during normal human walking at joint flexion of 20° was applied to the ACLR knee models using different tunnel angles (30°/45°/60° and 45°/60° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively). The distribution of von Mises stress and strain around the tunnel entrances and the graft was calculated and compared among the different finite element ACLR models with varying femoral drilling angles. Results: With an increasing coronal obliquity drilling angle (30° to 60°), the peak stress and maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel decreased from 30° to 45° and increased from 45° to 60°, respectively. With an increasing sagittal obliquity drilling angle (45° to 60°), the peak stress and the maximum strain on the bone tunnels increased. The lowest peak stress and maximum strain at the ACL tunnels were observed at 45° coronal/45° sagittal drilling angle (7.5 MPa and 7,568.3 μ-strain at the femoral tunnel entrance, and 4.0 MPa and 4,128.7 μ-strain at the tibial tunnel entrance). The lowest peak stress on the ACL graft occurred at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (27.8 MPa) drilling angle. Conclusions: The femoral tunnel drilling angle could affect both the stress and strain distribution on the femoral tunnel, tibial tunnel, and graft. A femoral tunnel drilling angle of 45° coronal/ 45° sagittal demonstrated the lowest peak stress, maximum strain on the femoral and tibial tunnel entrance, and the lowest peak stress on the ACL graft. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8661475/ /pubmed/34900975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.797389 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cheng, Wang, Jiang, Dimitriou, Cheng and Tsai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Cheng, Rongshan
Wang, Huizhi
Jiang, Ziang
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Cheng, Cheng-Kung
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title_full The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title_fullStr The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title_full_unstemmed The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title_short The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
title_sort femoral tunnel drilling angle at 45° coronal and 45° sagittal provided the lowest peak stress and strain on the bone tunnels and anterior cruciate ligament graft
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.797389
work_keys_str_mv AT chengrongshan thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT wanghuizhi thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT jiangziang thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT dimitrioudimitris thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT chengchengkung thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT tsaitsungyuan thefemoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT chengrongshan femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT wanghuizhi femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT jiangziang femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT dimitrioudimitris femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT chengchengkung femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft
AT tsaitsungyuan femoraltunneldrillingangleat45coronaland45sagittalprovidedthelowestpeakstressandstrainonthebonetunnelsandanteriorcruciateligamentgraft