Cargando…
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296 |
_version_ | 1784613382657146880 |
---|---|
author | Bonacci, Robert A. Manahan, Lillian M. Miller, James S. Moonan, Patrick K. Lipparelli, Missy B. DiFedele, Lisa M. Davis, Lora B. Lash, R. Ryan Oeltmann, John E. |
author_facet | Bonacci, Robert A. Manahan, Lillian M. Miller, James S. Moonan, Patrick K. Lipparelli, Missy B. DiFedele, Lisa M. Davis, Lora B. Lash, R. Ryan Oeltmann, John E. |
author_sort | Bonacci, Robert A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We retrospectively assessed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing surveillance data from the Washington State centralized program for August 1–31, 2020 and October 1–31, 2020. We combined SARS-CoV-2 testing reports with contact tracing data to compare completeness, reporting of contacts, and program timeliness. Results: For August and October respectively, 4,600 (of 12,521) and 2,166 (of 16,269) individuals with COVID-19 were referred to the state program for case investigation. Investigators called 100% of referred individuals; 65% (August) and 76% (October) were interviewed. Of individuals interviewed, 33% reported contacts in August and 45% in October, with only mild variation by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity. In August, 992 individuals with COVID-19 reported a total of 2,584 contacts (mean, 2.6), and in October, 739 individuals reported 2,218 contacts (mean, 3.0). Among contacts, 86% and 78% participated in interviews for August and October. The median time elapsed from specimen collection to contact interview was 4 days in August and 3 days in October, and from symptom onset to contact interview was 7 days in August and 6 days in October. Conclusions: While contact tracing improved with time, the proportion of individuals disclosing contacts remained below 50% and differed minimally by demographic characteristics. The longest time interval occurred between symptom onset and test result notification. Improving elicitation of contacts and timeliness of contact tracing may further decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8661592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86615922021-12-11 COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 Bonacci, Robert A. Manahan, Lillian M. Miller, James S. Moonan, Patrick K. Lipparelli, Missy B. DiFedele, Lisa M. Davis, Lora B. Lash, R. Ryan Oeltmann, John E. Front Public Health Public Health Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We retrospectively assessed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing surveillance data from the Washington State centralized program for August 1–31, 2020 and October 1–31, 2020. We combined SARS-CoV-2 testing reports with contact tracing data to compare completeness, reporting of contacts, and program timeliness. Results: For August and October respectively, 4,600 (of 12,521) and 2,166 (of 16,269) individuals with COVID-19 were referred to the state program for case investigation. Investigators called 100% of referred individuals; 65% (August) and 76% (October) were interviewed. Of individuals interviewed, 33% reported contacts in August and 45% in October, with only mild variation by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity. In August, 992 individuals with COVID-19 reported a total of 2,584 contacts (mean, 2.6), and in October, 739 individuals reported 2,218 contacts (mean, 3.0). Among contacts, 86% and 78% participated in interviews for August and October. The median time elapsed from specimen collection to contact interview was 4 days in August and 3 days in October, and from symptom onset to contact interview was 7 days in August and 6 days in October. Conclusions: While contact tracing improved with time, the proportion of individuals disclosing contacts remained below 50% and differed minimally by demographic characteristics. The longest time interval occurred between symptom onset and test result notification. Improving elicitation of contacts and timeliness of contact tracing may further decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8661592/ /pubmed/34900921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bonacci, Manahan, Miller, Moonan, Lipparelli, DiFedele, Davis, Lash and Oeltmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Bonacci, Robert A. Manahan, Lillian M. Miller, James S. Moonan, Patrick K. Lipparelli, Missy B. DiFedele, Lisa M. Davis, Lora B. Lash, R. Ryan Oeltmann, John E. COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title | COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title_full | COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title_short | COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 |
title_sort | covid-19 contact tracing outcomes in washington state, august and october 2020 |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonacciroberta covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT manahanlillianm covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT millerjamess covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT moonanpatrickk covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT lipparellimissyb covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT difedelelisam covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT davislorab covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT lashrryan covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 AT oeltmannjohne covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020 |