Cargando…

COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020

Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonacci, Robert A., Manahan, Lillian M., Miller, James S., Moonan, Patrick K., Lipparelli, Missy B., DiFedele, Lisa M., Davis, Lora B., Lash, R. Ryan, Oeltmann, John E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296
_version_ 1784613382657146880
author Bonacci, Robert A.
Manahan, Lillian M.
Miller, James S.
Moonan, Patrick K.
Lipparelli, Missy B.
DiFedele, Lisa M.
Davis, Lora B.
Lash, R. Ryan
Oeltmann, John E.
author_facet Bonacci, Robert A.
Manahan, Lillian M.
Miller, James S.
Moonan, Patrick K.
Lipparelli, Missy B.
DiFedele, Lisa M.
Davis, Lora B.
Lash, R. Ryan
Oeltmann, John E.
author_sort Bonacci, Robert A.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We retrospectively assessed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing surveillance data from the Washington State centralized program for August 1–31, 2020 and October 1–31, 2020. We combined SARS-CoV-2 testing reports with contact tracing data to compare completeness, reporting of contacts, and program timeliness. Results: For August and October respectively, 4,600 (of 12,521) and 2,166 (of 16,269) individuals with COVID-19 were referred to the state program for case investigation. Investigators called 100% of referred individuals; 65% (August) and 76% (October) were interviewed. Of individuals interviewed, 33% reported contacts in August and 45% in October, with only mild variation by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity. In August, 992 individuals with COVID-19 reported a total of 2,584 contacts (mean, 2.6), and in October, 739 individuals reported 2,218 contacts (mean, 3.0). Among contacts, 86% and 78% participated in interviews for August and October. The median time elapsed from specimen collection to contact interview was 4 days in August and 3 days in October, and from symptom onset to contact interview was 7 days in August and 6 days in October. Conclusions: While contact tracing improved with time, the proportion of individuals disclosing contacts remained below 50% and differed minimally by demographic characteristics. The longest time interval occurred between symptom onset and test result notification. Improving elicitation of contacts and timeliness of contact tracing may further decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8661592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86615922021-12-11 COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020 Bonacci, Robert A. Manahan, Lillian M. Miller, James S. Moonan, Patrick K. Lipparelli, Missy B. DiFedele, Lisa M. Davis, Lora B. Lash, R. Ryan Oeltmann, John E. Front Public Health Public Health Introduction: Case investigation and contact tracing are important tools to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, particularly when implemented efficiently. Our objective was to evaluate participation in and timeliness of COVID-19 contact tracing and whether these measures changed over time. Methods: We retrospectively assessed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing surveillance data from the Washington State centralized program for August 1–31, 2020 and October 1–31, 2020. We combined SARS-CoV-2 testing reports with contact tracing data to compare completeness, reporting of contacts, and program timeliness. Results: For August and October respectively, 4,600 (of 12,521) and 2,166 (of 16,269) individuals with COVID-19 were referred to the state program for case investigation. Investigators called 100% of referred individuals; 65% (August) and 76% (October) were interviewed. Of individuals interviewed, 33% reported contacts in August and 45% in October, with only mild variation by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity. In August, 992 individuals with COVID-19 reported a total of 2,584 contacts (mean, 2.6), and in October, 739 individuals reported 2,218 contacts (mean, 3.0). Among contacts, 86% and 78% participated in interviews for August and October. The median time elapsed from specimen collection to contact interview was 4 days in August and 3 days in October, and from symptom onset to contact interview was 7 days in August and 6 days in October. Conclusions: While contact tracing improved with time, the proportion of individuals disclosing contacts remained below 50% and differed minimally by demographic characteristics. The longest time interval occurred between symptom onset and test result notification. Improving elicitation of contacts and timeliness of contact tracing may further decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8661592/ /pubmed/34900921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bonacci, Manahan, Miller, Moonan, Lipparelli, DiFedele, Davis, Lash and Oeltmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Bonacci, Robert A.
Manahan, Lillian M.
Miller, James S.
Moonan, Patrick K.
Lipparelli, Missy B.
DiFedele, Lisa M.
Davis, Lora B.
Lash, R. Ryan
Oeltmann, John E.
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title_full COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title_fullStr COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title_short COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
title_sort covid-19 contact tracing outcomes in washington state, august and october 2020
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296
work_keys_str_mv AT bonacciroberta covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT manahanlillianm covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT millerjamess covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT moonanpatrickk covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT lipparellimissyb covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT difedelelisam covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT davislorab covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT lashrryan covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020
AT oeltmannjohne covid19contacttracingoutcomesinwashingtonstateaugustandoctober2020