Cargando…

SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy

We assessed the performance of the Panbio rapid antigen detection (RAD) test for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection and we compared it with the routine reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR)‐based molecular test in a population o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Treggiari, Davide, Piubelli, Chiara, Caldrer, Sara, Mistretta, Manuela, Ragusa, Andrea, Orza, Pierantonio, Pajola, Barbara, Piccoli, Donatella, Conti, Antonio, Lorenzi, Carlo, Serafini, Valentina, Boni, Marco, Perandin, Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27378
_version_ 1784613384388345856
author Treggiari, Davide
Piubelli, Chiara
Caldrer, Sara
Mistretta, Manuela
Ragusa, Andrea
Orza, Pierantonio
Pajola, Barbara
Piccoli, Donatella
Conti, Antonio
Lorenzi, Carlo
Serafini, Valentina
Boni, Marco
Perandin, Francesca
author_facet Treggiari, Davide
Piubelli, Chiara
Caldrer, Sara
Mistretta, Manuela
Ragusa, Andrea
Orza, Pierantonio
Pajola, Barbara
Piccoli, Donatella
Conti, Antonio
Lorenzi, Carlo
Serafini, Valentina
Boni, Marco
Perandin, Francesca
author_sort Treggiari, Davide
collection PubMed
description We assessed the performance of the Panbio rapid antigen detection (RAD) test for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection and we compared it with the routine reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR)‐based molecular test in a population of 4167 unselected patients admitted to IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital. Analysis stratified by cycling threshold (C (t)) value of SARS‐CoV‐2 gene targets indicated that antigen (Ag)‐positive C (t) values were significantly lower compared to Ag‐negative values (p < 0.0001). Overall, we found discordance in 140, tested negative by RAD and positive by RT‐PCR, and in 4 resulted positive by RAD and negative by RT‐PCR. RAD test achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 66.82% and 99.89%, respectively. The positive predictive value was shown to be 97.87% while the negative predictive value was shown to be 97.62%. In our context, the RAD test showed a reliable diagnostic response in subjects that displayed high C (t) values, corresponding to high viral load, while low ability was displayed to identify positive cases with medium‐low C (t) values, thus presenting low viral load and where confirmatory RT‐PCR was needed. Our finding supports the use of the RAD test in real‐life settings where a high volume of swabs is being processed but with caution when interpreting a positive test result in a low prevalence setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8661633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86616332021-12-10 SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy Treggiari, Davide Piubelli, Chiara Caldrer, Sara Mistretta, Manuela Ragusa, Andrea Orza, Pierantonio Pajola, Barbara Piccoli, Donatella Conti, Antonio Lorenzi, Carlo Serafini, Valentina Boni, Marco Perandin, Francesca J Med Virol Short Communication We assessed the performance of the Panbio rapid antigen detection (RAD) test for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection and we compared it with the routine reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR)‐based molecular test in a population of 4167 unselected patients admitted to IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital. Analysis stratified by cycling threshold (C (t)) value of SARS‐CoV‐2 gene targets indicated that antigen (Ag)‐positive C (t) values were significantly lower compared to Ag‐negative values (p < 0.0001). Overall, we found discordance in 140, tested negative by RAD and positive by RT‐PCR, and in 4 resulted positive by RAD and negative by RT‐PCR. RAD test achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 66.82% and 99.89%, respectively. The positive predictive value was shown to be 97.87% while the negative predictive value was shown to be 97.62%. In our context, the RAD test showed a reliable diagnostic response in subjects that displayed high C (t) values, corresponding to high viral load, while low ability was displayed to identify positive cases with medium‐low C (t) values, thus presenting low viral load and where confirmatory RT‐PCR was needed. Our finding supports the use of the RAD test in real‐life settings where a high volume of swabs is being processed but with caution when interpreting a positive test result in a low prevalence setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-14 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8661633/ /pubmed/34617606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27378 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Treggiari, Davide
Piubelli, Chiara
Caldrer, Sara
Mistretta, Manuela
Ragusa, Andrea
Orza, Pierantonio
Pajola, Barbara
Piccoli, Donatella
Conti, Antonio
Lorenzi, Carlo
Serafini, Valentina
Boni, Marco
Perandin, Francesca
SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title_full SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title_fullStr SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title_full_unstemmed SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title_short SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to RT‐PCR targeting different genes: A real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of Italy
title_sort sars‐cov‐2 rapid antigen test in comparison to rt‐pcr targeting different genes: a real‐life evaluation among unselected patients in a regional hospital of italy
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27378
work_keys_str_mv AT treggiaridavide sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT piubellichiara sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT caldrersara sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT mistrettamanuela sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT ragusaandrea sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT orzapierantonio sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT pajolabarbara sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT piccolidonatella sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT contiantonio sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT lorenzicarlo sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT serafinivalentina sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT bonimarco sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly
AT perandinfrancesca sarscov2rapidantigentestincomparisontortpcrtargetingdifferentgenesareallifeevaluationamongunselectedpatientsinaregionalhospitalofitaly